You say there would be about 1% if the cows there are now. Do you have source for that, or are you just making that up? In either case, do you think it would be okay to farm humans the way we farm cows? More humans would get a chance to live, so by your logic, why shouldn't we? Is it really a life, if you're just bred and raised to be slaughtered?

Do we agree that farming humans for their meat is wrong and inhumane? If so, then I'm confused why you think it's okay to farm cows for their meat. It should be considered just as inhumane.

There are kids living in third world countries that have no house and no family, and are barely surviving. Would you consider it heroic then, to save that kid, fatten him up for a few years with some food, just to slaughter him and eat him? Sure you gave him a "better" life than he had before, but does that make it okay?

There is no "humane" way to farm cows for their meat, just like there is no "humane" way to farm humans for their meat. "Freerange" is just a buzzword to make you feel good about needless barbaric slaughter of a creature that didn't need to die.

You say there would be about 1% if the cows there are now. Do you have source for that, or are you just making that up? In either case, do you think it would be okay to farm humans the way we farm cows? More humans would get a chance to live, so by your logic, why shouldn't we? Is it really a life, if you're just bred and raised to be slaughtered?

Do we agree that farming humans for their meat is wrong and inhumane? If so, then I'm confused why you think it's okay to farm cows for their meat. It should be considered just as inhumane.

There are kids living in third world countries that have no house and no family, and are barely surviving. Would you consider it heroic then, to save that kid, fatten him up for a few years with some food, just to slaughter him and eat him? Sure you gave him a "better" life than he had before, but does that make it okay?