There's a ton of these on YouTube that imo are better presented. The evidence is

(1) Material and weaving of the Shroud. The main deboonker claims are based on carbon dating an edge piece,but that turned to be a Middle Ages repair strip that had been attached with French weaving to replace a worn edge. It was stained with tea to look older.

(2) Ancient pollen, from the Holy Land and everywhere the Shroud has been on its way to Turin.

(3) Unique dirt on the side facing the body where the nose and the knees of the Man in the Shroud hit the ground, as for instance from falling under a heavy weight and getting smashed onto the pavement.

(4) Bloodstains high in bilirubin, which comes from prolonged torture and preserves the red color forever.

(5) Historical accuracy. The Romans did crucify people, did this up to the 300s AD, and crucified at least 30,000. They didn't execute just anyone this way, but escaped slaves, traitors, rebels, and similar threats to their Deep State. There are existing nails from crucifixion. There were various ways to do it to prolong suffering.

Of all the evidence that the Man in the Shroud was Jesus, most is in the bloodstains. They tell that he was lashed with three types of whip; that the nails in his hands actually went through the wrists, although they could have been driven in on the hand side and come through the wrists in back.

They show he was stabbed between the 5th and 6th ribs with a particular type of Roman lance, hitting the heart and draining water from the pericardial sac and pulmonary edema, as well as blood.

They show the wounds from the crown of thorns which seems to have been an indignity ever given to only one man, and that the crown was not a wreath, but a cap type crown as was common in the Middle East. Also, the thorns in back were driven in much further, perhaps in the aforementioned fall.

The bloodstains on the face on the Shroud exactly match the ones on the Sudorium, the "napkin" that was neatly folded in the tomb. This extra cloth was a Jewish requirement for transporting a body with a disfigured face and not a regular funeral wrap, although nothing against leaving it on. The face image is not on it, ergo it was taken off and folded by the mourners before folding the Shroud.

There's so much more. The image is caused by oxidation of a layer thinner than a hair. It could easily be brushed off. One person calculated that this could be a done by a pulse of a billion watts of UV light for a billionth of a second, but I am not qualified to comment on that.

There's a ton of these on YouTube that imo are better presented. The evidence is

(1) Material and weaving of the Shroud. The main deboonker claims are based on carbon dating an edge piece,but that turned to be a Middle Ages repair strip that had been attached with French weaving to replace a worn edge. It was stained with tea to look older.

(2) Ancient pollen, from the Holy Land and everywhere the Shroud has been on its way to Turin.

(3) Unique dirt on the side facing the body where the nose and the knees of the Man in the Shroud hit the ground, as for instance from falling under a heavy weight and getting smashed onto the pavement.

(4) Bloodstains high in bilirubin, which comes from prolonged torture and preserves the red color forever.

(5) Historical accuracy. The Romans did crucify people, did this up to the 300s AD, and crucified at least 30,000. They didn't execute just anyone this way, but escaped slaves, traitors, rebels, and similar threats to their Deep State. There are existing nails from crucifixion. There were various ways to do it to prolong suffering.

Of all the evidence that the Man in the Shroud was Jesus, most is in the bloodstains. They tell that he was lashed with three types of whip; that the nails in his hands actually went through the wrists, although they could have been driven in on the hand side and come through the wrists in back.

They show he was stabbed between the 4th and 5th ribs with a particular type of Roman lance, hitting the heart and draining water from the pericardial sac and pulmonary edema, as well as blood.

They show the wounds from the crown of thorns which seems to have been an indignity ever given to only one man, and that the crown was not a wreath, but a cap type crown as was common in the Middle East. Also, the thorns in back were driven in much further, perhaps in the aforementioned fall.

The bloodstains on the face on the Shroud exactly match the ones on the Sudorium, the "napkin" that was neatly folded in the tomb. This extra cloth was a Jewish requirement for transporting a body with a disfigured face and not a regular funeral wrap, although nothing against leaving it on. The face image is not on it, ergo it was taken off and folded by the mourners before folding the Shroud.

There's so much more. The image is caused by oxidation of a layer thinner than a hair. It could easily be brushed off. One person calculated that this could be a done by a pulse of a billion watts of UV light for a billionth of a second, but I am not qualified to comment on that.