The ship for stopping it sailed years ago. Especially now as the military and defense applications have become readily apparent. The Economic benefits alone would have been a pretty hefty carrot. Combine that with potential military benefits and it’ll be near impossible to justify ignoring if you have the resources to pursue such projects.

Even if some countries were inclined to do so and stop development. They couldn’t without leaving themselves vulnerable to nations and people without such ethical quandaries and concerns. In fact you’d probably get more people willing to agree to a 6 month moratorium rather then outright ban.

We’ve entered an AI arms race. And unlike Nuclear Devices. The after affects of its use won’t be readily apparent.Meaning there’s no immediate motivation for international treaties regulating its use.

It doesn’t help that alot of the people sounding the alarm are immediately jumping to “IT’LL BE SKYNET. WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!” People by and large ignore those sorts of people. Too much of a “Boy who cried Wolf” effect. For any of the numerous disasters similar “experts”, with credentials that were just as impressive, predicted over the years that ultimately never came to pass. People with ultimately more immediately pressing concerns then an imaginary scenario get sidelined in exchange for the clickbait panicked rants by people such as this.

Not to mention he’s also calling on the U.S to bomb the people who won’t comply with his proposed bans or try to secretly get around them.

You’d be likely to draw more legitimate long-lasting concern by highlighting possible economic consequences, possible unemployment, and ways it could potentially harm people in their day to day lives. Then the temporary concern an imagined apocalyptic scenario and panicky rant that’ll last until the next news cycle will generate.

It’s legitimate concerns as ultimately we don’t know. Our fiction is littered with examples of such projects going swimmingly. And many examples of it going badly. Dramatically so in fact. But a Schizo rant about an AI apocalypse isn’t going to draw much concern from the population at large. As frankly prophecies of doom from people with fancy titles and degrees have been a dime a dozen for decades.

The ship for stopping it sailed years ago. Especially now as the military and defense applications have become readily apparent. The Economic benefits alone would have been a pretty hefty carrot. Combine that with potential military benefits and it’ll be near impossible to justify ignoring if you have the resources to pursue such projects.

Even if some countries were inclined to do so and stop development. They couldn’t without leaving themselves vulnerable to nations and people without such ethical quandaries and concerns. In fact you’d probably get more people willing to agree to a 6 month moratorium rather then outright ban.

We’ve entered an AI arms race. And unlike Nuclear Devices. The after affects of its use won’t be readily apparent.Meaning there’s no immediate motivation for international treaties regulating its use.

It doesn’t help that alot of the people sounding the alarm are immediately jumping to “IT’LL BE SKYNET. WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!” People by and large ignore those sorts of people. Too much of a “Boy who cried Wolf” effect. For any of the numerous disasters similar “experts”, with credentials that were just as impressive, predicted over the years that ultimately never came to pass. People with ultimately more immediately pressing concerns then an imaginary scenario get sidelined in exchange for the clickbait panicked rants by people such as this.

Not to mention he’s also calling on the U.S to bomb the people who won’t comply with his proposed bans or try to secretly get around them.

You’d be likely to draw more legitimate long-lasting concern by highlighting possible economic consequences, possible unemployment, and ways it could potentially harm people in their day to day lives. Then the temporary concern an imagined apocalyptic scenario and panicky rant that’ll last until the next news cycle will generate.