In Heller it was upheld as an individual constitutional right to have and keep guns in the home for self protection. And this week in the New York case it was upheld as an individual constitutional right to keep and bear arms in public for self defense. Everyone supposedly feels all states will become “shall issue” states and rightfully they should.

But did the Supreme Court not open up the case that if carrying a gun is a constitutional right inside and outside the home, all states must allow concealed carry for all including non-residents. Constitutional Rights don’t stop at state borders. If they still want to license, so far they can, but they must issue non-resident licenses as well so that all citizens, not just residents can exercise their constitutional rights.

Am I wrong?

Ps… Q said “guns are safe”. I think he was right.

In Heller it was upheld as an individual constitutional right to have and keep guns in the home for self protection. And this week in the New York case it was upheld as an individual constitutional right to keep and bear arms in public for self defense. Everyone supposedly feels all states will become “shall issue” states and rightfully they should.

But did the Supreme Court not open up the case that if carrying a gun is a constitutional right inside and outside the home, all states must allow concealed carry for all including non-residents. Constitutional Rights don’t stop at state borders. If they still want to license, so far they can, but they must issue non-resident licenses as well so that all citizens, not just residents can exercise their constitutional rights.

Am I wrong?