It shows. He is weaker. The work she puts into being a top performance athlete that seeks stronger competition is substantial. Among her peers she is impressive. She is at a level where she is testing and advancing the known limits of what the female body can do and be. While he is a mediocre performance athlete seeking weaker competition. Among his peers he's mediocre. He is not testing the limits of what the male body can do. Not even close. The effects of testosterone are not trivial. For a mediocre male athlete to compete with a peak performing female athlete and win should end the debate on that.

She has beaten him in competition though -- but he's just a mediocre weirdo, not a peak performance male athlete so I doubt she gives a shit. He just shouldn't be there. Its an embarrassment to competitive sports and societal ethics/honor that he's even there.

It shows. He is weaker. The work she puts into being a top performance athlete that seeks stronger competition is substantial. Among her peers she is impressive. She is at a level where she is testing and advancing the known limits of what the female body can do and be. While he is a mediocre performance athlete seeking weaker competition. Among his peers he's mediocre. He is not testing the limits of what the male body can do. Not even close. The effects of testosterone are not trivial. For a mediocre male athlete to compete with a stronger female athlete and win should end the debate on that.

Keep in mind she has beaten him in competition though, the judges favored him in a (very) close decision because they wanted the competition to be his moment in history, not hers.