As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured, let alone their own soldiers. OWS was comprehensive in scope: development, manufacturing, distribution.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS-controlled PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume OWS was a rational, competent, White Hat operation. Therefore, a scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring is unfounded. It does not appear that anything was prevented or any plan was countered. Rather, it appears the plan was simply changed from what it was rumoured to be.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured, let alone their own soldiers. OWS was comprehensive in scope: development, manufacturing, distribution.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume OWS was a rational, competent, White Hat operation. Therefore, a scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring is unfounded. It does not appear that anything was prevented or any plan was countered. Rather, it appears the plan was simply changed from what it was rumoured to be.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured, let alone their own soldiers. OWS was comprehensive in scope: development, manufacturing, distribution.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume OWS was a rational, competent, White Hat operation. Therefore, a scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring is unfounded. It does no appear that anything was prevented or any plan was countered. Rather, it appears the plan was simply changed.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive in scope: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume OWS was a rational, competent, White Hat operation. Therefore, a scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring is unfounded. It does no appear that anything was prevented or any plan was countered. Rather, it appears the plan was simply changed.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume OWS was a rational, competent, White Hat operation. Therefore, a scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring is unfounded. It does no appear that anything was prevented or any plan was countered. Rather, it appears the plan was simply changed.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume OWS was a rational, competent White Hat operation. Therefore, a scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring is unfounded. It does no appear that anything was prevented or any plan was countered. Rather, it appears the plan was simply changed.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume OWS is was rational, competent White Hat operation. Therefore, a scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring is unfounded. It does no appear that anything was prevented or any plan was countered. Rather, it appears the plan was simply changed.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

The above facts cannot be rectified if we assume a rational, competent White Hat operation. Therefore, a theoretical scenario where OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns from occuring cannot be supported.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. *OWS is a military op with full supply chain control. * There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist.

There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to monitor the final product. OWS is a military op with full supply chain control.

There could not have been some brilliant Trump Admin plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultaneous FAILURE to investigate the contents of the vials. PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the DS had instructed the PCs to produce a poison?

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist.
There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product.
There could not have been some brilliant plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultanious FAILURE to investigate what was in the vials.

The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the Military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the contracted PCs had produced a DS-designed poison

These are logical impossibilities. Either the Military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresight of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist.
There could not have been some covert Military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product.
There could not have been some brilliant plan to avoid extended lockdowns by acquiring vaccines early and a simultanious FAILURE to investigate what was in the vials.

The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

How could the military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the contracted PCs had produced a DS-designed poison

These are logical impossibilities. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresigh of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. There could not have been some covert military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product. The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS is a military op with full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" vaccine development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the contracted PCs had produced a DS-designed poison

These are logical impossibilities. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresigh of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. There could not have been some covert military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product. The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS is a military op with full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

How could the Trump Admin...

• have enough foresight to avoid extended lockdowns by "rushing" development BUT
• not enough foresight to even investigate whether the contracted PCs had produced a DS-designed poison

These are logical impossibilities. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. Either the Trump admin had foresight of both or foresigh of neither.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. There could not have been some covert military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product. The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS is a military op with full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force DS PCs to partipate in their operation BUT
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns". In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns".

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. There could not have been some covert military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product. The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS is a military op with full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns". In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns".

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. There could not have been some covert military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product. The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns". In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns".

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. There could not have been some covert military intervention to force PCs to release early and a simultanious FAILURE to intervene in their final product. The latter did occur, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured a DS poison using subcontracted PCs and distributed it. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns", had PCs manufacture a DS poison and had the military subcontract with them to distribute it.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. There could not have been some covert military intervention to force PCs to release early, but somehow ZERO intervention in their final product. The latter did happen, and therefore the former did not.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured a DS poison using subcontracted PCs and distributed it. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns", had PCs manufacture a DS poison and had the military subcontract with them to distribute it.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. The whole op could only be a plan by the military or a plan by the DS or both. There could not have been some covert intervention to force PCs to release early, but somehow ZERO intervention in their final product.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured a DS poison using subcontracted PCs and distributed it. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns", had PCs manufacture a DS poison and had the military subcontract with them to distribute it.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist. The whole op could only be a plan by the military or a plan by the DS or both. There could not have been an intervention in release timing on one hand, but somehow NO intervention in final product on the other.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured a DS poison using subcontracted PCs and distributed it. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns", had PCs manufacture a DS poison and had the military subcontract with them to distribute it.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured a DS poison using subcontracted PCs and distributed it. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns", had PCs manufacture a DS poison and had the military subcontract with them to distribute it.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist because the DS was never prevented from doing anything.

As the OP implies, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured a DS poison using subcontracted PCs and distributed it. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns", had PCs manufacture a DS poison and had the military subcontract with them to distribute it.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist because the DS was not prevented from doing anything.

As the OP states, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured a DS poison using subcontracted PCs and distributed it. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns", had PCs manufacture a DS poison and had the military subcontract with them to distribute it.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist because the DS was not prevented from doing anything.

As the OP states, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns", manufactured and delivered their poison using PC subcontractors. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns" and used the military to subcontract with PCs to deliver their poison.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist because the DS was not prevented from doing anything.

As the OP states, if White Hats created OWS then presumably no one had to die or be injured. OWS was comprehensive: development, manufacturing, distribution.

If White Hats control the supply chain then one would NOT expect anyone to be poisoned, let alone their own soldiers.

It would not have been difficult for DS to counter OWS if the continued lockdowns were desired by them. Pharmacutical companies [PCs] are DS controlled from inception. They would simply say "we don't have it ready" and lockdowns would continue. But the whole thurst of OWS is "the military intervened and they're ready ahead of schedule".

OK, fine. If the PCs released the injections earlier than planned, it can only be because either:

• they were forced by the military, who knew that it was going to be artificially withheld OR
• they were not forced and the DS simply changed their plan

But then,

• If PCs were forced, then how were injectees still poisoned? OWS has full supply chain control to confirm the final product before distribution
• If PCs were not forced, then why was their product used as-is? PCs are known DS entities and vaccines are a known attack vector

How could the military...

• have enough control to force PCs to partipate in their operation YET
• not enough control to prevent a dangerous product from being produced by that very same operation?

That is an impossibility. Either the military had control of both or control of neither. In former case, the military decided "short lockdowns" and intentionally delivered a poison. In the latter, the DS decided "short lockdowns" and had the military unknowingly deliver their poison.

In either case, the scenario where initiating OWS "prevents" extended lockdowns simply does not exist because the DS was not prevented from doing anything.