I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything in earnest it is essential to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship "other gods" (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of if you are Source? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. Maybe he was trying to tell us something. The idea of this "dual nature of God" (Father and Son, where Jesus was exclusively the "Son of God" and the rest of us are not) wasn't part of the Christian tenet until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected than "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship "other gods" (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of if you are Source? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. Maybe he was trying to tell us something. The idea of this "dual nature of God" (Father and Son, where Jesus was exclusively the "Son of God" and the rest of us are not) wasn't part of the Christian tenet until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected than "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://www.academia.edu/33957139/Akhenatens_Monotheism_and_its_Relationship_with_Ancient_Hebrew_Religion https://mikecrusoesblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/aten-and-yahweh-a-comparison-of-psalm-104-and-the-hymn-of-the-aten/ https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship "other gods" (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of if you are Source? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. Maybe he was trying to tell us something. The idea of this "dual nature of God" (Father and Son, where Jesus was exclusively the "Son of God" and the rest of us are not) wasn't part of the Christian tenet until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected than "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://www.academia.edu/33957139/Akhenatens_Monotheism_and_its_Relationship_with_Ancient_Hebrew_Religion https://mikecrusoesblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/aten-and-yahweh-a-comparison-of-psalm-104-and-the-hymn-of-the-aten/ https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship "other gods" (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of if you are Source? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. Maybe he was trying to tell us something. The idea of this "dual nature of God" (Father and Son, where Jesus was exclusively the "Son of God" and the rest of us are not) wasn't part of the Christian tenet until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected that "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://www.academia.edu/33957139/Akhenatens_Monotheism_and_its_Relationship_with_Ancient_Hebrew_Religion https://mikecrusoesblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/aten-and-yahweh-a-comparison-of-psalm-104-and-the-hymn-of-the-aten/ https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship "other gods" (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. Maybe he was trying to tell us something. The idea of this "dual nature of God" (Father and Son, where Jesus was exclusively the "Son of God" and the rest of us are not) wasn't part of the Christian tenet until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected that "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://www.academia.edu/33957139/Akhenatens_Monotheism_and_its_Relationship_with_Ancient_Hebrew_Religion https://mikecrusoesblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/aten-and-yahweh-a-comparison-of-psalm-104-and-the-hymn-of-the-aten/ https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship other gods (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. Maybe he was trying to tell us something. The idea of this "dual nature of God" (Father and Son, where Jesus was exclusively the "Son of God" and the rest of us are not) wasn't part of the Christian tenet until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected that "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://www.academia.edu/33957139/Akhenatens_Monotheism_and_its_Relationship_with_Ancient_Hebrew_Religion https://mikecrusoesblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/aten-and-yahweh-a-comparison-of-psalm-104-and-the-hymn-of-the-aten/ https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship other gods (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. Maybe he was trying to tell us something. The idea of this "dual nature of God" (Father and Son, where Jesus was exclusively the "Son of God" and the rest of us are not) wasn't part of the Christian tenet (there was much debate on it) until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected that "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://www.academia.edu/33957139/Akhenatens_Monotheism_and_its_Relationship_with_Ancient_Hebrew_Religion https://mikecrusoesblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/aten-and-yahweh-a-comparison-of-psalm-104-and-the-hymn-of-the-aten/ https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship other gods (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? What is there to be "Jealous" of? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. The idea of this "dual nature of God" wasn't part of the Christian tenet (there was much debate on it) until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected that "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.
I was expecting to hear about "all" of this evidence to the contrary, but you presented none.
What I was doing was giving you a place to begin, and asking critical questions that you took as "emotional diatribe filled with Red Herrings" (which is itself a Red Herring argument. They were actual critical questions that you didn't address, but rather dismissed as "emotional diatribe").
The following pieces of evidence are not offered as "the truth," but rather as a place to start. In order to investigate anything you must learn to distinguish between the evidence, the argument, and the rhetoric that is contained in a presentation. It is the evidence that is most important. The argument (logic) is useful. The rhetoric, which fills up a lot of these things, is a lot less relevant. Rhetoric is the "convincing words" outside of evidence and argument (laid over the top) that attempt to persuade you to agree with what someone believes. Thus I offer these pieces of work for the evidence and argument that are included within them. Nothing more.
Relationship between Egyptian and Hebrew religions:
https://www.academia.edu/33957139/Akhenatens_Monotheism_and_its_Relationship_with_Ancient_Hebrew_Religion https://mikecrusoesblog.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/aten-and-yahweh-a-comparison-of-psalm-104-and-the-hymn-of-the-aten/ https://books.google.com/books?id=n3x46NoDOcUC
Other deities before Judaism became monotheistic
https://archive.org/details/earlyhistoryofgo0000smit
Judaism was henotheistic (not monotheistic)
"God" (really the people who wrote the Bible) states explicitly that his name is Jealous.
Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
Don't worship other gods (an admittance there are other gods) because My name is Jealous. How can the Source of all things be so Jealous that he proclaims that as his name? This, by the way, is a critical question, not "emotional diatribe."
Jesus said he was the Son of God. He said we are ALL Children of God. The idea of this "dual nature of God" wasn't part of the Christian tenet (there was much debate on it) until it was made into law at the Nicene Convention three centuries after Jesus. This first ecumenical council was formed by a self-proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God to unite the disparate religions of the Roman Empire (pagan, Christian, Egyptian, Jewish, etc.) and thus gain Rulership of a failing nation by setting up a God-Emporer system. The idea of the Trinity didn't become an official thing until it too was written into law in 383 AD at the second ecumenical conference.
Once you start really digging into the primary evidence supplied by other religions that were prominent in the region (and across the world, since it was far more connected that "official history" would like us to believe) you see where the Religion we call "Christianity" really came from. The idea of the Trinity was strictly a pagan concept. It was included to appease all the pagans, and create a unifying religion to rule all of Europe.
None of this addresses all the books (that list is not comprehensive) that were previously canon that were left out of the final cut. The "alternate" gospels are particularly revealing.
This is the tip of the iceberg on the evidence I have gathered. At some point I will write it up formally. I am too busy revealing the first veil. The second will have to wait.