Without more details who knows. The intention of the article is to say the politician is a bad dude based on x information, but the information is slanted and spun. The writer is a full of shit political hatchetman.

If the question is whether 12 year olds getting married and parents consenting to it is okay or fucked up. Its fucked up.

Now ask yourself Purkiss, if you made the forum better informed here...

The answer is yes, you passed me the ball, and I slam dunked that shit. They are better informed now. You're welcome.

Without more details who the fuck knows or cares. That's not the real story in the news article. The story this article is trying to tell, you can see it if you read the comments of people here in this thread, is that this politician is a bad dude, and you've successfully spread the message the writer of the article intended for this news article to spread. Even though the writer is a full of shit political hatchetman.

Now ask yourself Purkiss, if you made the forum better informed here...

The answer is yes, you passed me the ball, and I slam dunked that shit. They are better informed now. You're welcome.