He was not in support of the boycott because Anheuser Busch contributes to the GOP (and the DNC) at a 60:40 ratio. I just wonder if he was being serious, mentioning that they buy both parties but only buy more GOP didn't make his defense of AB very convincing.

Budweiser isn't giving the entire political apparatus money for nothing. It gets something in return, regardless of who the people decide to elect to the majority.

That's the very definition of a corporate uniparty. Heads I win, tails you lose.

He was not in support of the boycott because Anheuser Busch contributes to the GOP (and the DNC) at a 60:40 ratio. I just wonder if he was being serious, mentioning that the buy both parties but only buy more GOP didn't make his defense of AB very convincing.

Budweiser isn't giving the entire political apparatus money for nothing. It gets something in return, regardless of who the people decide to elect to the majority.

That's the very definition of a corporate uniparty. Heads I win, tails you lose.