Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Well, you need to understand a gyrocompass, as least as much as by reading a Wikipedia description. It interacts with the rotation of the Earth to point North, and the dip angle depends on the latitude. On the North pole, the compass rotor axis and the polar axis align, and the interaction becomes zero. A physical principle is a proof. There is also the fact that the Sun rises and sets, and that we orbit around it (established by triangulation to the nearest stars). It goes on and on, but you deny that any of it would be "proof." I suspect if you were kidnapped and sent on a voyage to the Moon (and back) you would deny what you see out the porthole. You have no standard of "proof." You simply deny after denial: "That's not proof." Don't forget circumnavigation by land, sea, air, and space (especially space).

And I remain adamant that we have not been lied to about "everything." If you think so, you can try and prove it---but proving it would be to show unmistakable and unimpeachable evidence for a contrary truth. There are some lies out there, but you are being sucked into one of the biggest lies of all time and you are warm and fuzzy about it. So much for knowing and consciously lying to yourself...in your sleep.

If the Earth was a flat plane in rotation, the oceans would drain to the outer edge. Right? Because the farther south we went, the more it would seem to tilt downward with the effect of centrifugal acceleration (southward). I'm not waiting on any "nanosecond" conversion. If you understood the implications of what you are claiming, you would have thrown it out a long time ago. Ergo, you don't understand the implications.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Well, you need to understand a gyrocompass, as least as much as by reading a Wikipedia description. It interacts with the rotation of the Earth to point North, and the dip angle depends on the latitude. On the North pole, the compass rotor axis and the polar axis align, and the interaction becomes zero. A physical principle is a proof. There is also the fact that the Sun rises and sets, and that we orbit around it (established by triangulation to the nearest stars). It goes on and on, but you deny that any of it would be "proof." I suspect if you were kidnapped and sent on a voyage to the Moon (and back) you would deny what you see out the porthole. You have no standard of "proof." You simply deny after denial. "That's not proof." Don't forget circumnavigation by land, sea, air, and space (especially space).

And I remain adamant that we have not been lied to about "everything." If you think so, you can try and prove it---but proving it would be to show unmistakable and unimpeachable evidence for a contrary truth. There are some lies out there, but you are being sucked into one of the biggest lies of all time and you are warm and fuzzy about it. So much for knowing and consciously lying to yourself...in your sleep.

If the Earth was a flat plane in rotation, the oceans would drain to the outer edge. Right? Because the farther south we went, the more it would seem to tilt downward with the effect of centrifugal acceleration (southward). I'm not waiting on any "nanosecond" conversion. If you understood the implications of what you are claiming, you would have thrown it out a long time ago. Ergo, you don't understand the implications.

1 year ago
1 score