100% agree. It's so frustrating when people just post some screenshot of something without a link to it. Skeptics aren't just going to believe something because you show them a picture. Give some solid evidence, like a link to it in a published medical journal.

It's also annoying that others have to spend time trying to track down the original source that the photo is of. The OP could save dozens of collective research hours for anons by taking a minute to post the original source. And if you don't have the original source, why are you sharing it before confirming it's true?

100% agree. It's so frustrating when people just post some screenshot of something without a link to it. Skeptics aren't just going to believe something because you show them a picture of something. Give some solid evidence, like a link to it in a published medical journal.

It's also annoying that others have to spend time trying to track down the original source that the photo is of. The OP could save dozens of collective research hours for anons by taking a minute to post the original source. And if you don't have the original source, why are you sharing it before confirming it's true?