Brings up an interesting point. There were "anons" long before Q. And all "anons" don't necessarily believe Q to be true. So I get their frustration and anger over all anons being associated with Q.

And I think at this point, all the facetious "who is this "qanon" you speak of?" is getting a bit silly. It's how the MSM is going to refer to us, no matter how we respond to it. Acting like we have no clue who they mean isn't accomplishing anything.

Brings up an interesting point. There were "anons" long before Q. And all "anons" don't necessarily believe Q to be true. So I get theirbfrustration and anger over all anons being associated with Q.

And I think at this point, all the facetious "who is this "qanon" you speak of?" is getting a bit silly. It's how the MSM is going to refer to us, no matter how we respond to it. Acting like we have no clue who they mean isn't accomplishing anything.