Remember, the lawsuit was brought on by Dominion & not FOX. We can see FOX went to the very last minute and then settled out to Dominion for roughly half of what Dominion was asking for in damages, which was $1.6 billion. Who was negligent? Tucker? Hannity? Laura Ingram?

If the lawsuit would've proceeded, it was up to Dominion to prove FOX was at fault for defamation and damage to Dominion. I'm fairly certain FOX would've had massive proof of Dominion's pre-set algorithms, ratio percentages and internet access (hacking abilities) in to their programmed machines. And evidence of Dominion personnel on voting day tampering for the desired election win outcome. This could've been proven not just from US elections, but throughout the world where Dominion machines were/are used. Think of the worldwide ramifications of the shutdown of Dominion voting machine enterprise worldwide. It would be devastating to the 'Global System' of maintaining control of elections (selections). Their scheme would've been revealed once and for all and they would cease to exist.

Why did FOX settle? Yes, because they are part of the DS problem. It's just optics of shifting money from one corrupt enterprise to another.

So now, in the public eye, the optics are that FOX had slim-to-no proof that Dominion machines swayed the election(s) and the states that use Dominion machines are reassured of their massive $$$ contracts are maintained. It gives Dominion leverage with state election officials and the state legislatures thereof to continue the use of their machines. And that following a questionable election, no need for a forensic audit of those the machines.

Was this lawsuit a 'forewarning' to FOX of future lawfare on anything and everything that the Global Cabal/Deep State declares 'against the grain'? Hence Tucker Carlson being let go....

We can see FOX went to the very last minute and then settled out to Dominion for roughly half of what Dominion was asking for in damages, which was $1.6 billion.

If the lawsuit would've proceeded, it was up to Dominion to prove FOX was at fault for defamation and damage to Dominion. I'm fairly certain FOX would've had massive proof of Dominion's pre-set algorithms, ratio percentages and internet access (hacking abilities) in to their programmed machines. And evidence of Dominion personnel on voting day tampering for the desired election win outcome. This could've been proven not just from US elections, but throughout the world where Dominion machines were/are used. Think of the worldwide ramifications of the shutdown of Dominion voting machine enterprise worldwide. It would be devastating to the 'Global System' of maintaining control of elections (selections). Their scheme would've been revealed once and for all and they would cease to exist.

Why did FOX settle? Yes, because they are part of the DS problem. It's just optics of shifting money from one corrupt enterprise to another.

So now, in the public eye, the optics are that FOX had slim-to-no proof that Dominion machines swayed the election(s) and the states that use Dominion machines are reassured of their massive $$$ contracts are maintained. It gives Dominion leverage with state election officials and the state legislatures thereof to continue the use of their machines. And that following a questionable election, no need for a forensic audit of those the machines.