I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it; some time in the 1960s the USARL just stopped cold all work on HCQ.
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987; use by vets 1981; experimental ~1979

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) 12Feb-1996 after blocking it for 9 years; Actual tablets in use no than 22Nov-1996 according to this: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/14/2021-14935/determination-that-stromectol-ivermectin-tablets-6-milligrams-were-not-withdrawn-from-sale-for

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect Ivermectin is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it; some time in the 1960s the USARL just stopped cold all work on HCQ.
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987; use by vets 1981; experimental ~1979

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) 12Feb-1996 after blocking it for 9 years; No later than 22Nov-1996 according to this: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/14/2021-14935/determination-that-stromectol-ivermectin-tablets-6-milligrams-were-not-withdrawn-from-sale-for

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect Ivermectin is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987; use by vets 1981; experimental ~1979

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) 12Feb-1996 after blocking it for 9 years; No later than 22Nov-1996 according to this: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/14/2021-14935/determination-that-stromectol-ivermectin-tablets-6-milligrams-were-not-withdrawn-from-sale-for

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect Ivermectin is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) 12Feb-1996 after blocking it for 9 years; No later than 22Nov-1996 according to this: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/14/2021-14935/determination-that-stromectol-ivermectin-tablets-6-milligrams-were-not-withdrawn-from-sale-for

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect Ivermectin is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) 12Feb-1996 after blocking it for 9 years; No later than 22Nov-1996 according to this: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/14/2021-14935/determination-that-stromectol-ivermectin-tablets-6-milligrams-were-not-withdrawn-from-sale-for

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect Ivermectin is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) in 1994? after blocking it for 7 years; No later than Nov22, 1996 according to this: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/14/2021-14935/determination-that-stromectol-ivermectin-tablets-6-milligrams-were-not-withdrawn-from-sale-for

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect Ivermectin is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) in 1994 after blocking it for 7 years

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect Ivermectin is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) in 1994 after blocking it for 7 years

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect it is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) in 1994 after blocking it for 7 years

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appeared to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.

I am not a chemist, but one may confirm this with some chemical signature that is similar between HCQ and Ivermectin. Chemically, I suspect it is HCQ+(Something else unknown).

I made these historical connections:

1. 1945-1960s: USARL developed HCQ in a timeframe that suggests they took the chloroquine research from the Germans/Nazis post WW2 and built on it
2. 1800-1945: Germans/Nazis appeared to have gotten information on quinine from either the Catholic Church, other missionaries, or from their colonial conquests 1800-1945 timeframe and developed it into chloroquine
3. 1630-1800s: Quinine info was known from south american missionaries (alleged source) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29737660/

And then I extrapolated forward based on players involved and timeframe and added this item #4 in between the 1981-87 activities of Merck and partners.

4. 1970s Merck partnered or licensed tech from USARL late 60s-early70s for several projects; shortly afterward they partnered with a Japanese partner that had been working independently 60s-early70s; Ivermectin was available as early as 1979 according to some research papers I read in the past; definitely by 1981 being used on animals according to this: https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/ivermectin-mectizan.html

5. 1980s Ivermectin is approved for human use (non-US) 1987

6. 1990s FDA finally approves Ivermectin for human use (US) in 1994 after blocking it for 7 years

I am filling in the gap between when the USARL stopped developing HCQ (presumably because they were working on something better), and something better appearing shortly after which appear to be based at least in part on the HCQ research findings in terms of its impact on humans.