PART 2: MILITARY TRIBUNAL COURTS https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze0cKY/part-2-structure-of-the-constitu/c/
PART 3: SOVEREIGN STATES https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze0tJY/part-3-structure-of-the-constitu/c/
PART 4: ARTICLE III SCOTUS https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze1Axd/part-4-structure-of-the-constitu/c/
PART 1 focuses on the individual and the role played as anons and/or as Pro Se litigants and constitutional magistrates per the 9th/10th Amendments.
This is a simplified diagram that has been created from a legal brief that is being used for active litigation. Variations of this are useful for showing the sovereign state structure as well. Washington DC (Organic Act of 1871), Federal Lands, and Tribal Lands may belong INSIDE the Article I box. Tribal land management via Article I entity vs Article II entity (Dept of Interior) is confusing and unclear. Article I management and control of Washington, D.C. is crystal clear.
LEFT SIDE ARROW is Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate where individuals can take back Constitutional authority per the 9th/10th Amendment when the state courts, federal courts, and Constitutional sheriffs refuse to follow their oaths: https://www.faithbeyondbelief.ca/blog/2021/2/1/the-doctrine-of-the-lesser-magistrates.
Implementation of this means that individuals whose Constitutional Rights are violated may create their own Constitutional Courts with citizens of their county to establish Grand Juries and investigate and indict those in violation. It requires a Constitutional Sheriff (any county sheriff) to enforce orders from the court. You are "un-delegating authority" granted to the State Courts and Federal Courts because they have failed to follow their oaths or do their jobs. You now become a judge (magistrate) with Constitutional authority granted by the 9th and 10th amendments to enforce your rights and investigate, indict, prosecute, and put to trial the violators. This is necessary if the UCMJ has jurisdiction (state of War), but does not take action.
PART 2: MILITARY TRIBUNAL COURTS https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze0cKY/part-2-structure-of-the-constitu/c/
PART 3: SOVEREIGN STATES https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze0tJY/part-3-structure-of-the-constitu/c/
PART 4: ARTICLE III SCOTUS https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze1Axd/
PART 1 focuses on the individual and the role played as anons and/or as Pro Se litigants and constitutional magistrates per the 9th/10th Amendments.
This is a simplified diagram that has been created from a legal brief that is being used for active litigation. Variations of this are useful for showing the sovereign state structure as well. Washington DC (Organic Act of 1871), Federal Lands, and Tribal Lands may belong INSIDE the Article I box. Tribal land management via Article I entity vs Article II entity (Dept of Interior) is confusing and unclear. Article I management and control of Washington, D.C. is crystal clear.
LEFT SIDE ARROW is Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate where individuals can take back Constitutional authority per the 9th/10th Amendment when the state courts, federal courts, and Constitutional sheriffs refuse to follow their oaths: https://www.faithbeyondbelief.ca/blog/2021/2/1/the-doctrine-of-the-lesser-magistrates.
Implementation of this means that individuals whose Constitutional Rights are violated may create their own Constitutional Courts with citizens of their county to establish Grand Juries and investigate and indict those in violation. It requires a Constitutional Sheriff (any county sheriff) to enforce orders from the court. You are "un-delegating authority" granted to the State Courts and Federal Courts because they have failed to follow their oaths or do their jobs. You now become a judge (magistrate) with Constitutional authority granted by the 9th and 10th amendments to enforce your rights and investigate, indict, prosecute, and put to trial the violators. This is necessary if the UCMJ has jurisdiction (state of War), but does not take action.
PART 2: https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze0cKY/part-2-structure-of-the-constitu/c/
PART 3: https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5ze0tJY/part-3-structure-of-the-constitu/c/
PART 1 focuses on the individual and the role played as anons and/or as Pro Se litigants and constitutional magistrates per the 9th/10th Amendments.
This is a simplified diagram that has been created from a legal brief that is being used for active litigation. Variations of this are useful for showing the sovereign state structure as well. Washington DC (Organic Act of 1871), Federal Lands, and Tribal Lands may belong INSIDE the Article I box. Tribal land management via Article I entity vs Article II entity (Dept of Interior) is confusing and unclear. Article I management and control of Washington, D.C. is crystal clear.
LEFT SIDE ARROW is Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate where individuals can take back Constitutional authority per the 9th/10th Amendment when the state courts, federal courts, and Constitutional sheriffs refuse to follow their oaths: https://www.faithbeyondbelief.ca/blog/2021/2/1/the-doctrine-of-the-lesser-magistrates.
Implementation of this means that individuals whose Constitutional Rights are violated may create their own Constitutional Courts with citizens of their county to establish Grand Juries and investigate and indict those in violation. It requires a Constitutional Sheriff (any county sheriff) to enforce orders from the court. You are "un-delegating authority" granted to the State Courts and Federal Courts because they have failed to follow their oaths or do their jobs. You now become a judge (magistrate) with Constitutional authority granted by the 9th and 10th amendments to enforce your rights and investigate, indict, prosecute, and put to trial the violators. This is necessary if the UCMJ has jurisdiction (state of War), but does not take action.
PART 1 focuses on the individual and the role played as anons and/or as Pro Se litigants and constitutional magistrates per the 9th/10th Amendments.
This is a simplified diagram that has been created from a legal brief that is being used for active litigation. Variations of this are useful for showing the sovereign state structure as well. Washington DC (Organic Act of 1871), Federal Lands, and Tribal Lands may belong INSIDE the Article I box. Tribal land management via Article I entity vs Article II entity (Dept of Interior) is confusing and unclear. Article I management and control of Washington, D.C. is crystal clear.
LEFT SIDE ARROW is Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate where individuals can take back Constitutional authority per the 9th/10th Amendment when the state courts, federal courts, and Constitutional sheriffs refuse to follow their oaths: https://www.faithbeyondbelief.ca/blog/2021/2/1/the-doctrine-of-the-lesser-magistrates.
Implementation of this means that individuals whose Constitutional Rights are violated may create their own Constitutional Courts with citizens of their county to establish Grand Juries and investigate and indict those in violation. It requires a Constitutional Sheriff (any county sheriff) to enforce orders from the court. You are "un-delegating authority" granted to the State Courts and Federal Courts because they have failed to follow their oaths or do their jobs. You now become a judge (magistrate) with Constitutional authority granted by the 9th and 10th amendments to enforce your rights and investigate, indict, prosecute, and put to trial the violators. This is necessary if the UCMJ has jurisdiction (state of War), but does not take action.
This is a simplified diagram that has been created from a legal brief that is being used for active litigation. Variations of this are useful for showing the sovereign state structure as well. Washington DC (Organic Act of 1871), Federal Lands, and Tribal Lands may belong INSIDE the Article I box. Tribal land management via Article I entity vs Article II entity (Dept of Interior) is confusing and unclear. Article I management and control of Washington, D.C. is crystal clear.
LEFT SIDE ARROW is Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate where individuals can take back Constitutional authority per the 9th/10th Amendment when the state courts, federal courts, and Constitutional sheriffs refuse to follow their oaths: https://www.faithbeyondbelief.ca/blog/2021/2/1/the-doctrine-of-the-lesser-magistrates.
Implementation of this means that individuals whose Constitutional Rights are violated may create their own Constitutional Courts with citizens of their county to establish Grand Juries and investigate and indict those in violation. It requires a Constitutional Sheriff (any county sheriff) to enforce orders from the court. You are "un-delegating authority" granted to the State Courts and Federal Courts because they have failed to follow their oaths or do their jobs. You now become a judge (magistrate) with Constitutional authority granted by the 9th and 10th amendments to enforce your rights and investigate, indict, prosecute, and put to trial the violators. This is necessary if the UCMJ has jurisdiction (state of War), but does not take action.