Sadly, he also posts clickbait crap stuff. I took him seriously until he began regurgitating NewsPunch rubbish.

The labels of being a "q-follower" and "truther" are NOT evidence of credibility. Actions and content are. And in my book, he has more red flags than I want to see.

Note: it is unabashed clickbaitism to post a highly sensationalized over-the-top accusation and then NOT post any sauce or details, except "Check my website on this <future> date.

When I saw this, it hit the final nail in the coffin for me re: David Sorenson. I'm not saying the majority of the content he references is false, but anyone who utilizes manipulative clickbait methods gets a fail grading in my book.

Sadly, he also posts clickbait crap stuff. I took him seriously until he began regurgitating NewsPunch rubbish.

The labels of being a "q-follower" and "truther" are NOT evidence of credibility. Actions and content are. And in my book, he has failed.

Noe: it is unabashed clickbaitism to post a highly sensationalized over-the-top accusation and then NOT post any sauce or details, except "Check my website on this <future> date.

When I saw this, it hit the final nail in the coffin for me re: David Sorenson.