The only difference is whether the assets belong to the people or to the elite, and whether the new currency system will become a chain or a freedom.

Well stated. I would add a caution however.

In the past, our "freedoms" have been given to us (I mean that as stated) under false pretenses. For example, while the DoI gives lip service to the Sovereignty of the Individual (the only possible true statement of freedom), the Constitution explicitly stated the opposite (people are subjects to the Governments Rule).

Everything I have found so far in history has been controlled opposition. Not everyone knows they are controlled opposition (I don't think), even some of those close to the top; i.e. there appear to be quite a few True Believers among the organizers, but it seems that all organizations, all "Revolutions," all everything has been run and managed under false pretenses, naming an intended outcome under the guise of Liberty, full of wonderful words and ideals, while actually being written (in the law) as the opposite. Those opposite statements are subtle though. They tend to be "reasonable concessions." They are, "Minor requirements just to make a functioning government."

Whether it be the "two step plan" of the Soviet States, or the "eminent domain", and "armed forces members are government property" of the United States, the fraud of these systems is the same. It is the creation of a hierarchy, with the Central Authority at the top that accomplishes a Jurisdictional Fraud. That fraud being the claim to the Right to tell the Individual what they can or can't do (a statement that the Individuals Jurisdiction is actually the Governments Jurisdiction, or rather, the Jurisdiction of the people that control the Government).

The statements used to justify these Jurisdictional violations are, "It's just under a few 'necessary' circumstances," or "It's just until we get the ball rolling," etc.

There's always some concession that goes directly against the flowery words of the "spirit" that starts the movement (DoI e.g.). It's justified as "just being practical."

Because both the "Cabal" and "WH" plans are really the exact same plan excepting who winds up with control in the end, it is essential to watch out for such fuckery (Jurisdictional fraud) because this pattern of Controlled Opposition leading towards Freedom/not-really-Freedom has been repeated over, and over, and over again for Millennia, with every step leading directly to the same group of people in control. As it so happens, the current group of people (WH's/Trump et al) have many direct connections to those same people.

That they have direct connections is not necessarily indicative of Controlled Opposition, and I don't intend "doom and gloom." On the contrary, it is impossible to overthrow such an entrenched system unless you are an insider. This is a caution. We must be diligent in our view of happenings. We must take control ourselves and not rely on "The Plan." If "The Plan" is really for We The People, then The Plan would be exactly for We The People taking control, to BE The Plan.

If The Plan is anything else, then We The People must be our own Plan.

In any case, the solution is the same. Helping people to understand that We are The Plan.

The only difference is whether the assets belong to the people or to the elite, and whether the new currency system will become a chain or a freedom.

Well stated. I would add a caution however.

In the past, our "freedoms" have been given to us (I mean that as stated) under false pretenses. For example, while the DoI gives lip service to the Sovereignty of the Individual (the only possible true statement of freedom), the Constitution explicitly stated the opposite (people are subjects to the Governments Rule).

Everything I have found so far in history has been controlled opposition. Not everyone knows they are controlled opposition (I don't think), even some of those close to the top; i.e. there appear to be quite a few True Believers among the organizers, but it seems that all organizations, all "Revolutions," all everything has been run and managed under false pretenses, naming an intended outcome under the guise of Liberty, full of wonderful words and ideals, while actually being written (in the law) as the opposite. Those opposite statements are subtle though. They tend to be "reasonable concessions." They are, "Minor requirements just to make a functioning government."

Whether it be the "two step plan" of the Soviet States, or the "eminent domain", and "armed forces members are government property" of the United States, the fraud of these systems is the same. It is the creation of a hierarchy, with the Central Authority at the top that accomplishes a Jurisdictional Fraud. That fraud being the claim to the Right to tell the Individual what they can or can't do (a statement that the Individuals Jurisdiction is actually the Governments Jurisdiction, or rather, the people that control the Government).

The statements used to justify these Jurisdictional violations are, "It's just under a few 'necessary' circumstances," or "It's just until we get the ball rolling," etc.

There's always some concession that goes directly against the flowery words of the "spirit" that starts the movement (DoI e.g.). It's justified as "just being practical."

Because both the "Cabal" and "WH" plans are really the exact same plan excepting who winds up with control in the end, it is essential to watch out for such fuckery (Jurisdictional fraud) because this pattern of Controlled Opposition leading towards Freedom/not-really-Freedom has been repeated over, and over, and over again for Millennia, with every step leading directly to the same group of people in control. As it so happens, the current group of people (WH's/Trump et al) have many direct connections to those same people.

That they have direct connections is not necessarily indicative of Controlled Opposition, and I don't intend "doom and gloom." On the contrary, it is impossible to overthrow such an entrenched system unless you are an insider. This is a caution. We must be diligent in our view of happenings. We must take control ourselves and not rely on "The Plan." If "The Plan" is really for We The People, then The Plan would be exactly for We The People taking control, to BE The Plan.

If The Plan is anything else, then We The People must be our own Plan.

In any case, the solution is the same. Helping people to understand that We are The Plan.