Yes. That your analogy is fundamentally flawed because it ignores a crucial part of the argument. Giving up vapid entertainment is the easiest battle to fight and yet you come up with your justification for why it's actually worth giving your money to Disney (again giving your money to a company you know is involved with at least some of the things you claim to be vehemently against) using a flawed analogy. How are we supposed to win when people can't even give up their bread and circuses. I saw the first guardians of the galaxy movie when a friend brought it over, it was nothing special, an action popcorn flick. You speak of it like it's a story for the ages like Lord of the Rings (not that even that would change the fact that it's funding Disney in exchange for fantasy escapism)

Yes. That your analogy is fundamentally flawed because it ignores a crucial part of the argument. Giving up vapid entertainment is the easiest battle to fight and yet you come up with your justification for why it's actually worth giving your money to Disney using a flawed analogy. How are we supposed to win when people can't even give up their bread and circuses. I saw the first guardians of the galaxy movie when a friend brought it over, it was nothing special, an action popcorn flick. You speak of it like it's a story for the ages like Lord of the Rings (not that even that would change the fact that it's funding Disney in exchange for fantasy escapism)

Yes. That your analogy is fundamentally flawed because it ignores a crucial part of the argument. Giving up vapid entertainment is the easiest battle to fight and yet you come up with your justification for why it's actually worth giving your money to Disney using a flawed analogy. How are we supposed to win when people can't even give up their bread and circuses. I saw the first guardians of the galaxy movie when a friend brought it over, it was nothing special, an action popcorn flick. You speak of it like it's a story for the ages like Lord of the Rings (not that even that would change funding Disney)

Yes. That your analogy is fundamentally flawed because it ignores a crucial part of the argument. Giving up vapid entertainment is the easiest battle to fight and yet you come up with your justification for why it's actually worth giving your money to Disney using a flawed analogy