if your State of XX Bar Corporation (foreign corporation incorporated in DC) has been unconstitutionally integrated into your State Judicial Branch (there would be a specific date it was integrated via a change to your State Constitution, see changes to the Judicial Branch article) then you can argue that it violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees "a republican form of government" NOT a "corporate form of gov't". This integration, usually prior to passage of the Amendment that allows the State Tax Franchise Board makes that Amendment unconstitutional as well as all actions after the change to a corporate gov't are automatically null and void, ab initio per Marbury v. Madison (1803).

If this is for California, the unconstitutional integration into the Judicial Branch happened on November 8, 1966, and the State Income Tax Amendment 13 was in the early 70s so it is automatically null and void, ab initio. The CA Franchise Tax Board is also null and void and must repay all taxes ever collected as they have no Constitutional authority and their operation is illegal and unconstitutional, imo.

I would go read the State Constitution to see if they define labor capital separate from income (labor capital = property per 5th,14th, and =effects per 4th Amendment). Usually Income Tax is Article 13 of most State Constitutions. You can always ask for clarification on their definition of "income" and claim it is labor capital untaxable and not subject to audit, but since they are an unconstitutional criminal organization they may not buy it and you may have to sue them in Federal District Court for $402 filing fee to get an injunction to halt all of their attempted audit actions against you. State audits are usually targeted shakedowns.

Arguably violation of 4th Amendment "warrantless search" per their demand for financial information (i.e. "papers") and violation of 5th Amendment "cannot be compelled to be witness against himself" per demand for information AND "deprivation of liberty and (potentially) property without due process" (no crime has been committed and no charges filed by them). Force them to provide "probable cause" for their actions and watch the audit disappear.

if your State of XX Bar Corporation (foreign corporation incorporated in DC) has been unconstitutionally integrated into your State Judicial Branch (there would be a specific date it was integrated via a change to your State Constitution, see changes to the Judicial Branch article) then you can argue that it violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees "a republican form of government" NOT a "corporate form of gov't". This integration, usually prior to passage of the Amendment that allows the State Tax Franchise Board makes that Amendment unconstitutional as well as all actions after the change to a corporate gov't are automatically null and void, ab initio per Marbury v. Madison (1803).

If this is for California, the unconstitutional integration into the Judicial Branch happened on November 8, 1966, and the State Income Tax Amendment 13 was in the early 70s so it is automatically null and void, ab initio. The CA Franchise Tax Board is also null and void and must repay all taxes ever collected as they have no Constitutional authority and their operation is illegal and unconstitutional, imo.

I would go read the State Constitution to see if they define labor capital separate from income (labor capital = property per 5th,14th, and =effects per 4th Amendment). Usually it is Article 13 of most Constitutions. You can always ask for clarification on their definition of "income" and claim it is labor capital untaxable and not subject to audit, but since they are an unconstitutional criminal organization they may not buy it and you may have to sue them in Federal District Court for $402 filing fee to get an injunction to halt all of their attempted audit actions against you. State audits are usually targeted shakedowns.

Arguably violation of 4th Amendment "warrantless search" per their demand for financial information (i.e. "papers") and violation of 5th Amendment "cannot be compelled to be witness against himself" per demand for information AND "deprivation of liberty and (potentially) property without due process" (no crime has been committed and no charges filed by them). Force them to provide "probable cause" for their actions and watch the audit disappear.

if your State of XX Bar Corporation (foreign corporation incorporated in DC) has been unconstitutionally integrated into your State Judicial Branch (there would be a specific date it was integrated via a change to your State Constitution, see changes to the Judicial Branch article) then you can argue that it violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees "a republican form of government" NOT a "corporate form of gov't". This integration, usually prior to passage of the Amendment that allows the State Tax Franchise Board makes that Amendment unconstitutional as well as all actions after the change to a corporate gov't are automatically null and void, ab initio per Marbury v. Madison (1803).

If this is for California, the unconstitutional integration into the Judicial Branch happened on November 8, 1966, and the State Income Tax Amendment 13 was in the early 70s so it is automatically null and void, ab initio. The CA Franchise Tax Board is also null and void and must repay all taxes ever collected as they have no Constitutional authority and their operation is illegal and unconstitutional, imo.

I would go read the State Constitution to see if they define labor capital separate from income (labor capital = property per 5th,14th, and =effects per 4th Amendment). Usually it is Article 13 of most Constitutions. You can always ask for clarification on their definition of "income" and claim it is labor capital untaxable and not subject to audit, but since they are an unconstitutional criminal organization they may not buy it and you may have to sue them in Federal District Court for $402 filing fee to get an injunction to halt all of their attempted audit actions against you. State audits are usually targeted shakedowns.

Arguably violation of 4th Amendment "warrantless search" per their demand for financial information and violation of 5th Amendment "cannot be compelled to be witness against himself" per demand for information AND "deprivation of liberty and (potentially) property without due process" (no crime has been committed and no charges filed by them). Force them to provide "probable cause" for their actions and watch the audit disappear.

if your State of XX Bar Corporation (foreign corporation incorporated in DC) has been unconstitutionally integrated into your State Judicial Branch (there would be a specific date it was integrated via a change to your State Constitution, see changes to the Judicial Branch article) then you can argue that it violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees "a republican form of government" NOT a "corporate form of gov't". This integration, usually prior to passage of the Amendment that allows the State Tax Franchise Board makes that Amendment unconstitutional as well as all actions after the change to a corporate gov't are automatically null and void, ab initio per Marbury v. Madison (1803).

If this is for California, the unconstitutional integration into the Judicial Branch happened on November 8, 1966, and the State Income Tax Amendment 13 was in the early 70s so it is automatically null and void, ab initio. The CA Franchise Tax Board is also null and void and must repay all taxes ever collected as they have no Constitutional authority and their operation is illegal and unconstitutional, imo.

I would go read the State Constitution to see if they define labor capital separate from income. Usually it is Article 13 of most Constitutions. You can always ask for clarification on their definition of "income" and claim it is labor capital untaxable and not subject to audit, but since they are an unconstitutional criminal organization they may not buy it and you may have to sue them in Federal District Court for $402 filing fee to get an injunction to halt all of their attempted audit actions against you. State audits are usually targeted shakedowns.

Arguably violation of 4th Amendment "warrantless search" per their demand for financial information and violation of 5th Amendment "cannot be compelled to be witness against himself" per demand for information AND "deprivation of liberty and (potentially) property without due process" (no crime has been committed and no charges filed by them). Force them to provide "probable cause" for their actions and watch the audit disappear.

if your State of XX Bar Corporation (foreign corporation incorporated in DC) has been unconstitutionally integrated into your State Judicial Branch (there would be a specific date it was integrated via a change to your State Constitution, see changes to the Judicial Branch article) then you can argue that it violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees "a republican form of government" NOT a "corporate form of gov't". This integration, usually prior to passage of the Amendment that allows the State Tax Franchise Board makes that Amendment unconstitutional as well as all actions after the change to a corporate gov't are automatically null and void, ab initio per Marbury v. Madison (1803).

If this is for California, the unconstitutional integration into the Judicial Branch happened on November 8, 1966, and the State Income Tax Amendment 13 was in the early 70s so it is automatically null and void. The CA Franchise Tax Board is also null and void and must repay all taxes every collected as they have no Constitutional authority and their operation is illegal and unconstitutional, imo.

I would go read the State Constitution to see if they define labor capital separate from income. Usually it is Article 13 of most Constitutions. You can always ask for clarification on their definition of "income" and claim it is labor capital untaxable and not subject to audit, but since they are an unconstitutional criminal organization they may not buy it and you may have to sue them in Federal District Court for $402 filing fee to get an injunction to halt all of their attempted audit actions against you. State audits are usually targeted shakedowns.

Arguably violation of 4th Amendment "warrantless search" per their demand for financial information and violation of 5th Amendment "cannot be compelled to be witness against himself" per demand for information AND "deprivation of liberty and (potentially) property without due process" (no crime has been committed and no charges filed by them). Force them to provide "probable cause" for their actions and watch the audit disappear.

if your State of XX Bar Corporation (foreign corporation incorporated in DC) has been unconstitutionally integrated into your State Judicial Branch (there would be a specific date it was integrated via a change to your State Constitution, see changes to the Judicial Branch article) then you can argue that it violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees "a republican form of government" NOT a "corporate form of gov't". This integration, usually prior to passage of the Amendment that allows the State Tax Franchise Board makes that Amendment unconstitutional as well as all actions after the change to a corporate gov't are automatically null and void, ab initio per Marbury v. Madison (1803).

If this is for California, the unconstitutional integration into the Judicial Branch happened on November 8, 1966, and the State Income Tax Amendment 13 was in the early 70s so it is automatically null and void. The CA Franchise Tax Board is also null and void and must repay all taxes every collected as they have no Constitutional authority and their operation is illegal and unconstitutional, imo.

I would go read the State Constitution to see if they define labor capital separate from income. Usually it is Article 13 of most Constitutions. You can always ask for clarification on their definition of "income" and claim it is labor capital untaxable and not subject to audit, but since they are an unconstitutional criminal organization they may not buy it and you may have to sue them in Federal District Court for $402 filing fee to get an injunction to halt all of their attempted audit actions against you. State audits are usually targeted shakedowns.

arguably violation of 4th Amendment "warrantless search" per their demand for financial information and violation of 5th Amendment "cannot be compelled to be witness against himself" per demand for information AND "deprivation of liberty and (potentially) property without due process (no crime has been committed and no charges filed by them). Force them to provide "probable cause" for their actions and watch the audit disappear.

if your State of XX Bar Corporation (foreign corporation incorporated in DC) has been unconstitutionally integrated into your State Judicial Branch (there would be a specific date it was integrated via a change to your State Constitution, see changes to the Judicial Branch article) then you can argue that it violates Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees "a republican form of government" NOT a "corporate form of gov't". This integration, usually prior to passage of the Amendment that allows the State Tax Franchise Board makes that Amendment unconstitutional as well as all actions after the change to a corporate gov't are automatically null and void, ab initio per Marbury v. Madison (1803).

If this is for California, the unconstitutional integration into the Judicial Branch happened on November 8, 1966, and the State Income Tax Amendment 13 was in the early 70s so it is automatically null and void. The CA Franchise Tax Board is also null and void and must repay all taxes every collected as they have no Constitutional authority and their operation is illegal and unconstitutional, imo.

I would go read the State Constitution to see if they define labor capital separate from income. Usually it is Article 13 of most Constitutions. You can always ask for clarification on their definition of "income" and claim it is labor capital untaxable and not subject to audit, but since they are an unconstitutional criminal organization they may not buy it and you may have to sue them in Federal District Court for $402 filing fee to get an injunction to halt all of their attempted audit actions against you. State audits are usually targeted shakedowns.