I sit at my computer this morning, and what do I find? A comment to a post I made to a thread three months ago...to which you've been filling with your comments on and off since catsfive started it. I'm not sure why you're essentially communicating with just me, and singling me out, since no one is reading this thread any longer except you, but I'll go with it. You also seem to act as if I have already challenged you -- I have not "spitballed" nor said "prove me wrong." I'm not sure where this is coming from. I always treat others on this forum with respect.

You are firmly convinced of your interpretation of HAARP, and I don't need to change your mind. That's fine for you to entertain your understanding of it, but, since you asked me to respond, I will.

As others stated in this thread as well, if HAARP is indeed behind "some" earthquakes, it's not necessary for it to produce the energy you claim to cause an earthquake. All it has to do is release the pent-up energy on either side of a fault line, which, yes, is somewhat analogous to the Tacoma Bridge example. (There is, in fact, stored energy in a bridge. The weight of the structure, held by supports, contributed to the collapse once the harmonic waves began lifting, bouncing, and twisting it.) This "could" be accomplished either with standing waves, and/or localized heating of rock to the point of releasing steam to assist in the slippage. Expanding steam from groundwater, could, in fact, be all that's required to cause a fault to slip. Microwaves are good at that, no?

There is incredible energy in steam. In the example of an earthquake, it wouldn't be necessary for steam to be released all along the fault line to cause a quake. (i.e., lots and lots of energy from an exterior source interacting with the fault line for miles.) All that would be necessary is for a localized heating event to "push the first domino," so to speak. The energy stored in the plates does the rest.

You say there is no linkage between HAARP and earthquakes. You provide no evidence why you know this to be so, except for claiming that HAARP only interacts with the atmosphere. You ask me to "establish a plausible physical theory" for what I wrote, when I asked none of anyone else. You, also, didn't provide a plausible physical theory. But notice how I have written so much more to explain my point of view, than you did yours? At least I'm making a genuine attempt to explain myself.

The more one reads about this technology, the more it will become apparent that it can be focused anywhere, above or below ground. It can be reflected by the ionosphere, yes, but is this the only way it can be transmitted to distant locations? Only those who actually use this technology know for certain. But I submit to you, a microwave oven passes its energy through interior components from the magnetron to the food it's focused on in the tray, without heating up or melting those interior components. (The warming inside the oven -- other than the food and food container -- is radiant, not from the components themselves heating via the energy passing through them.) The only thing protecting you standing near it is special shielding.

I don't have time now to search, but there are videos of earthquakes and how they affect the Earth. Sometimes they just shake, but others, quite similar to waves, as a matter of fact. This was an area of interest of Nikola Tesla's. This particular event is controversial, but it is alleged he developed an "earthquake machine" -- a small device in a box with a modest output, utilizing standing wave theory. His theory was that all one needed to do was find the individual harmonic of a structure to get the structure itself to assist in amplifying the wave.

This is anecdotal, of course, but thirty minutes before the May 12, 2008 Sichuan earthquake, locals filmed very strange luminous and colorful lights in the clouds and sky. There is video of this.

Peace, brother. I'm not sure why you felt impelled to respond to a lone post I made, or why you seem offended by what I wrote. I don't come to this forum to pick "internet fights." I think it's most helpful to all who visit GAW to come to the message board with an open mind, because that's the way we can maximize what we learn. The minute we assume we know everything about a subject, is the very instant everyone else with a slightly different view becomes an adversary, and we close off the ability to perhaps absorb a new way of looking at things.

I sit at my computer this morning, and what do I find? A comment to a post I made to a thread three months ago...to which you've been filling with your comments on and off since catsfive started it. I'm not sure why you're essentially communicating with just me, and singling me out, since no one is reading this thread any longer except you, but I'll go with it. You also seem to act as if I have already challenged you -- I have not "spitballed" nor said "prove me wrong." I'm not sure where this is coming from. I always treat others on this forum with respect.

You are firmly convinced of your interpretation of HAARP, and I don't need to change your mind. That's fine for you to entertain your understanding of it, but, since you asked me to respond, I will.

As others stated in this thread as well, if HAARP is indeed behind "some" earthquakes, it's not necessary for it to produce the energy you claim to cause an earthquake. All it has to do is release the pent-up energy on either side of a fault line, which, yes, is somewhat analogous to the Tacoma Bridge example. (There is, in fact, stored energy in a bridge. The weight of the structure, held by supports, contributed to the collapse once the harmonic waves began lifting, bouncing, and twisting it.) This "could" be accomplished either with standing waves, and/or localized heating of rock to the point of releasing steam to assist in the slippage. Expanding steam from groundwater, could, in fact, be all that's required to cause a fault to slip. Microwaves are good at that, no?

There is incredible energy in steam. In the example of an earthquake, it wouldn't be necessary for steam to be released all along the fault line to cause a quake. (i.e., lots and lots of energy from an exterior source interacting with the fault line for miles.) All that would be necessary is for a localized heating event to "push the first domino," so to speak. The energy stored in the plates does the rest.

You say there is no linkage between HAARP and earthquakes. You provide no evidence why you know this to be so, except for claiming that HAARP only interacts with the atmosphere. You ask me to "establish a plausible physical theory" for what I wrote, when I asked none of anyone else. You, also, didn't provide a plausible physical theory. But notice how I have written so much more to explain my point of view, than you did yours? At least I'm making a genuine attempt to explain myself.

The more one reads about this technology, the more it will become apparent that it can be focused anywhere, above or below ground. It can be reflected by the ionosphere, yes, but is this the only way it can be transmitted to distant locations? Only those who actually use this technology know for certain. But I submit to you, a microwave oven passes its energy through interior components from the magnetron to the food it's focused on in the tray, without heating up or melting those interior components. (The warming inside the oven is radiant, not from the components themselves heating via the energy passing through them.) The only thing protecting you standing near it is special shielding.

I don't have time now to search, but there are videos of earthquakes and how they affect the Earth. Sometimes they just shake, but others, quite similar to waves, as a matter of fact. This was an area of interest of Nikola Tesla's. This particular event is controversial, but it is alleged he developed an "earthquake machine" -- a small device in a box with a modest output, utilizing standing wave theory. His theory was that all one needed to do was find the individual harmonic of a structure to get the structure itself to assist in amplifying the wave.

This is anecdotal, of course, but thirty minutes before the May 12, 2008 Sichuan earthquake, locals filmed very strange luminous and colorful lights in the clouds and sky. There is video of this.

Peace, brother. I'm not sure why you felt impelled to respond to a lone post I made, or why you seem offended by what I wrote. I don't come to this forum to pick "internet fights." I think it's most helpful to all who visit GAW to come to the message board with an open mind, because that's the way we can maximize what we learn. The minute we assume we know everything about a subject, is the very instant everyone else with a slightly different view becomes an adversary, and we close off the ability to perhaps absorb a new way of looking at things.