"Neo" means "new," or in this context, "revival." That is what I am saying. They weren't "new," nor was it a 'revival." The CIA was the marriage of the OSS (which was itself married to the Nazis and MI6), the Nazi intelligence organization and the Nazi scientists. See the creation of the OSS (at Rockefeller Center), the Gehlen Organization, and Project Paperclip. These people were in bed for decades before the CIA was created. Allen Dulles had direct interaction with the Nazi Intelligence from at least 1933, years before the war even started. It was he and Gehlen that started the CIA, but they had already made that arrangement long before when the Nazis "surrendered" two years previous, which Allen Dulles was in charge of.

"Neo-Nazi" is completely inaccurate. It misses the point of what happened entirely, suggesting the opposite of the truth. The Nazis in the US, were the Nazis in Germany. They were the exact same people, on both sides of the pond. They ran the show here, and they ran the show there. That's because the American Intelligence organizations were the same organizations they always were from at least WWI. Just because they put a new label on say, the OSS to "create" the CIA, doesn't make it not the same organization. It was all the same people doing all the same things in the same way. That isn't "new," that's old. When you put a new label on an old toaster, it's still the same toaster. The misdirection is that it's "new". "Neo-nazi" is a misdirection, suggesting the opposite of what really happened.

"Neo" means "new," or in this context, "revival." That is what I am saying. They weren't "new," nor was it a 'revival." The CIA was the marriage of the OSS (which was itself married to the Nazis and MI6), the Nazi intelligence organization and the Nazi scientists. See the Gehlen Organization, and Project Paperclip. These people were in bed for decades before the CIA was created. Allen Dulles had direct interaction with the Nazi Intelligence from at least 1933, years before the war even started. It was he and Gehlen that started the CIA, but they had already made that arrangement long before when the Nazis "surrendered" two years previous, which Allen Dulles was in charge of.

"Neo-Nazi" is completely inaccurate. It misses the point of what happened entirely, suggesting the opposite of the truth. The Nazis in the US, were the Nazis in Germany. They were the exact same people, on both sides of the pond. They ran the show here, and they ran the show there. That's because the American Intelligence organizations were the same organizations they always were from at least WWI. Just because they put a new label on say, the OSS to "create" the CIA, doesn't make it not the same organization. It was all the same people doing all the same things in the same way. That isn't "new," that's old. When you put a new label on an old toaster, it's still the same toaster. The misdirection is that it's "new". "Neo-nazi" is a misdirection, suggesting the opposite of what really happened.

"Neo" means "new," or in this context, "revival." That is what I am saying. They weren't "new," nor was it a 'revival." The CIA was the marriage of the OSS (which was itself married to the Nazis and MI6), the Nazi intelligence organization and the Nazi scientists. See the Gehlen Organization, and Project Paperclip. These people were in bed for decades before the CIA was created. Allen Dulles had direct interaction with the Nazi Intelligence from at least 1933, years before the war even started. It was he and Gehlen that started the CIA, but they had already made that arrangement long before when the Nazis "surrendered" two years previous, which Allen Dulles was in charge of.

"Neo-Nazi" is completely inaccurate. It misses the point of what happened entirely, suggesting the opposite of the truth. The Nazis in the US, were the Nazis in Germany. They were the exact same people, on both sides of the pond. They ran the dhow here, and they ran the show there. That's because the American Intelligence organizations were the same organizations they always were from at least WWI. Just because they put a new label on say, the OSS to "create" the CIA, doesn't make it not the same organization. It was all the same people doing all the same things in the same way. That isn't "new," that's old. When you put a new label on an old toaster, it's still the same toaster. The misdirection is that it's "new". "Neo-nazi" is a misdirection, suggesting the opposite of what really happened.

"Neo" means "new," or in this context, "revival." That is what I am saying. They weren't "new," nor was it a 'revival." The CIA WAS the marriage of the Nazi intelligence organization and the Nazi scientists. See the Gehlen Organization, and Project Paperclip. These people were in bed for decades before the CIA was created. Allen Dulles had direct interaction with the Nazi Intelligence from at least 1933, years before the war even started. It was he and Gehlen that started the CIA, but they had already made that arrangement long before when the Nazis "surrendered" two years previous, which Allen Dulles was in charge of.

"Neo-Nazi" is completely inaccurate. It misses the point of what happened entirely, suggesting the opposite of the truth. The Nazis in the US, were the Nazis in Germany. They were the exact same people, on both sides of the pond. They ran the dhow here, and they ran the show there. That's because the American Intelligence organizations were the same organizations they always were from at least WWI. Just because they put a new label on say, the OSS to "create" the CIA, doesn't make it not the same organization. It was all the same people doing all the same things in the same way. That isn't "new," that's old. When you put a new label on an old toaster, it's still the same toaster. The misdirection is that it's "new". "Neo-nazi" is a misdirection, suggesting the opposite of what really happened.