Again, you are missing what really happened. Yes, there was a transition from one program to another.

Sometime in the 80s NBC put out Cheers. A few years later they put out Frasier. Different programs, though there are some obvious connections. When Cheers was over and Frasier was still running, no one called NBC "Neo-NBC" because they were running a different program.

You are SERIOUSLY stretching the meaning of the word "neo" to apply it in this context, and again, doing so changes the perception from an appreciation of what is really going on to something completely different.

It is appropriate to use NBC because they just so happened to be next door neighbors to the CIA/OSS/Nazis in Rockefeller center, run by the same people, designed to put out their propaganda. That's really an aside, but it gives an appreciation of the larger scope of the organization.

The "post WWII" thing itself is problematic, because it suggests that WWII ever really ended. Hell, WWII never really began. It was really just WWI. WWI itself never ended, it just keeps getting a new label stuck over the top of the old one, like a 50 year old car, with the same license plate, and 50 years of registration tags.

By categorizing things as separate, you make them separate. They aren't separate. Using language that acknowledges that a thing is the same thing helps to appreciate the larger picture. Defining it as "different" just because it got a new label caters to the fraud and helps perpetuate it.

There is nothing "neo" about the group you are calling the "neo-Nazis." You are aiding and abetting their fraud by suggesting it as a "proper label."

Again, you are missing what really happened. Yes, there was a transition from one program to another.

Sometime in the 80s NBC put out Cheers. A few years later they put out Frasier. Different programs, though there are some obvious connections. When Cheers was over and Frasier was still running, no one called NBC "Neo-NBC" because they were running a different program.

You are SERIOUSLY stretching the meaning of the word "neo" to apply it in this context, and again, doing so changes the perception from an appreciation of what is really going on to something completely different.

It is appropriate to use NBC because they just so happened to be next door neighbors to the CIA/OSS/Nazis in Rockefeller center, run by the same people. That's really an aside, but it gives an appreciation of the larger scope of the organization.

The "post WWII" thing itself is problematic, because it suggests that WWII ever really ended. Hell, WWII never really began. It was really just WWI. WWI itself never ended, it just keeps getting a new label stuck over the top of the old one, like a 50 year old car, with the same license plate, and 50 years of registration tags.

By categorizing things as separate, you make them separate. They aren't separate. Using language that acknowledges that a thing is the same thing helps to appreciate the larger picture. Defining it as "different" just because it got a new label caters to the fraud and helps perpetuate it.

There is nothing "neo" about the group you are calling the "neo-Nazis." You are aiding and abetting their fraud by suggesting it as a "proper label."