You espouse a label that perpetuates the fraud of separation, which suggests to me that there are details you may be missing. No one who heard the phrase "neo-Nazi" would think of anything except a revival of that group, rather than a direct continuation. Literally everyone else who uses that term means "revival". Thus, by communicating it in that manner, you cause confusion and misunderstanding, Instead of what people need to understand, which is that there is an obvious unity of organization and purpose during all steps of the "Nazi" operation, starting before WWI.

One of the problems with being an expert, is that the "expert" tends to find difficulty listening to other people that disagree with them. The ego gets in the way of honest investigation.

It is only when you become just a researcher,, instead of an expert, that you are open to seeing all of the evidence, especially that which doesn't jibe with your "expert knowledge".

You espouse a label that perpetuates the fraud of separation, which suggests to me that there are details you may be missing. No one who heard the phrase "neo-Nazi" would think of anything except a revival of that group, rather than a direct continuation. Thus, by communicating it in that manner, you cause confusion and misunderstanding, Instead of what people need to understand, which is that there is an obvious unity of organization and purpose during all steps of the "Nazi" operation, starting before WWI.

One of the problems with being an expert, is that the "expert" tends to find difficulty listening to other people that disagree with them. The ego gets in the way of honest investigation.

It is only when you become just a researcher,, instead of an expert, that you are open to seeing all of the evidence, especially that which doesn't jibe with your "expert knowledge".