I believe our excretory system is very complex and beyond our current understanding. In immunology it is admitted that their understanding of how the immune system works is less than 1%. That is an amazing revelation to me. It signifies the absolute insanity of vax☠xination and other invasive acts including colonoscopies. Moreover, people accept a system that demands we trust Strangers having job titles and permit them to invasively poke and probe the sanctity of our bodies. Who is this person performing these acts? How did this individual gain your trust? I use IFF as a standard for meeting people. "Identify Friend or Foe" forces me to evaluate who I am talking with. Is it a stranger? Or is it a person that has earned my trust? A medical doctor is most likely a stranger. Why should that individual care about you other than his/her income? Like lawyers, there are many unscrupulous medical doctors out there. They're pressured and straight-jacketed to perform to keep up their high-standard of living. All of this and more should be a red-flag. But how many people ever consider this? Do people know that medical doctors have a great alibi and cause hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. This fact alone tells me the best-of-the-best are not examining their patients. To me, all these "medical" people are strangers. Strangers are not to be ever trusted. Mom and dad told us this when we were young. Nothing has changed.

The SARS-CoV2 pandemic provided the public with widespread exposure to the fraud hidden behind the alibi of the medical doctor's title. They told us the vax☠x was safe and effective, when all too many of them knew otherwise. Would a friend, who earned your trust inject a toxin in you? It's much easier for a stranger to do this than a friend, no?

Chemo therapy is another of these lies hiding behind the alibi of the oncologist's title. Chemo therapy has less than a 3% success rate. Most people don't ever know this, and if they did, it would provide pause and a search for alternative treatments. Certainly, the Oncologist, who makes a third of his wages from prescribing this toxin, won't ever tell you this though. In Florida where people go to retire, oncology is very profitable. They have a very convincing alibi with old people in that they can prescribe chemo drugs and the resulting death gets recorded as age-related cancer. After all, what would you expect? They're old people, right? It's also not coincidental that malpractice attorneys in Florida do very well too.

Allopathic Medicine is full of massive fraud. There's far more to the story than the two examples I addressed. Colonoscopies are not needed, nor should they be done. Colonoscopies Fail to Reduce Colorectal-Related Deaths. I recall my mother having to be ambulance to the hospital as a result of the doctor perforating her intestine after removing polyps. Did you know the intestinal wall is only one cell layer in thickness? Removing polyps is a asking for trouble, especially if intestinal waste (which is toxic) invades the body cavity due to a breech in the intestinal wall. My mother required emergency surgery and she almost died then.

Retired people are a good source of income to these doctors. As I said earlier, they have a good alibi that protects them from lawsuits. It's old people. Another article -- "Is a Colonoscopy Worth the Risk?" provides information on the risks of colonoscopies. There are alternatives to the colonoscopy. I've used the the Stool Sample Test. Then there is the FIT-DNA Test. These are home tests that eliminate paying to visit a medical doctor. Obviously, the medical profession doesn't like it so they will emphasis the colonoscopy over this. You pay more and they profit from it. You can find info on the internet describing these home tests. Of course, the best prevention of colon cancer is diet and there's much written about processed foods that seem to cause colon and rectum cancer.

I believe our excretory system is very complex and beyond our current understanding. In immunology it is admitted that their understanding of how the immune system works is less than 1%. That is an amazing revelation to me. It signifies the absolute insanity of vax☠xination and other invasive acts including colonoscopies. Moreover, people accept a system that demands we trust Strangers having job titles and permit them to invasively poke and probe the sanctity of our bodies. Who is this person performing these acts? How did this individual gain your trust? I use IFF as a standard for meeting people. "Identify Friend or Foe" forces me to evaluate who I am talking with. Is it a stranger? Or is it a person that has earned my trust? A medical doctor is most likely a stranger. Why should that individual care about you other than his/her income? Like lawyers, there are many unscrupulous medical doctors out there. They're pressured and straight-jacketed to perform to keep up their high-standard of living. All of this and more should be a red-flag. But how many people ever consider this? Do people know that medical doctors have a great alibi and cause hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. This fact alone tells me the best-of-the-best are not examining their patients. To me, all these "medical" people are strangers. Strangers are not to be ever trusted. Mom and dad told us this when we were young. Nothing has changed.

The SARS-CoV2 pandemic provided the public with widespread exposure to the fraud hidden behind the alibi of the medical doctor's title. They told us the vax☠x was safe and effective, when all too many of them knew otherwise. Would a friend, who earned your trust inject a toxin in you? It's much easier for a stranger to do this than a friend, no?

Chemo therapy is another of these lies hiding behind the alibi of the oncologist's title. Chemo therapy has less than a 3% success rate. Most people don't ever know this, and if they did, it would provide pause and a search for alternative treatments. Certainly, the Oncologist, who makes a third of his wages from prescribing this toxin, won't ever tell you this though. In Florida where people go to retire, oncology is very profitable. They have a very convincing alibi with old people in that they can prescribe chemo drugs and the resulting death gets recorded as age-related cancer. After all, what would you expect? They're old people, right? It's also not coincidental that malpractice attorneys in Florida do very well too.

Allopathic Medicine is full of massive fraud. There's far more to the story than the two examples I addressed. Colonoscopies are not needed, nor should they be done. Colonoscopies Fail to Reduce Colorectal-Related Deaths. I recall my mother having to be ambulance to the hospital as a result of the doctor perforating her intestine after removing polyps. Did you know the intestinal wall is only one cell layer in thickness? Removing polyps is a asking for trouble, especially if intestinal waste (which is toxic) invades the body cavity due to a breech in the intestinal wall. My mother required emergency surgery and she almost died then.

Retired people are a good source of income to these doctors. As I said earlier, they have a good alibi that protects them from lawsuits. It's old people. Another article -- "Is a Colonoscopy Worth the Risk?" provides information on the risks of colonoscopies. There are alternatives to the colonoscopy. I've used the the Stool Sample Test. Then there is the FIT-DNA test. These are home tests that eliminate paying to visit a medical doctor. Obviously, the medical profession doesn't like it so they will emphasis the colonoscopy over this. You pay more. You can find info on the internet describing these home tests. Of course, the best prevention of colon cancer is diet and there's much written about processed foods that seem to cause colon and rectum cancer.