I'm all for no plane on both: the Pentagon, and the Pennsylvania field.

I'm not sure about WTC1/2 - plane/no-plane?

Still, it's an irrelevant point, thankfully (that would have made a nasty plane/no-plane division). It's irrelevant because WTC7 wasn't hit with a plane, and fell at approximately free-fall, straight down, and pictures show mostly into its own footprint.

WTC7 ended up being the smoking gun for that whole day, and i believe all 3 buildings were imploded, simply due to the fact there is not enough energy to compromise the buildings structure below 10-20 floors below WTC1/2's 'impact' floor... certainly not in the way we saw it go down boom.. boom.. boom.. floor by floor at a high rate of speed, right down to the ground floor.

I'm 100% for a re-investigation on this. But at this point we have bigger things to focus on.

I'm all for no plane on both: the Pentagon, and the Pennsylvania field.

I'm not sure about WTC1/2 - plane/no-plane?

Still, it's an irrelevant point, thankfully (that would have made a nasty plane/no-plane division). It's irrelevant because WTC7 fell at approximately free-fall, straight down, and pictures show mostly into its own footprint.

WTC7 ended up being the smoking gun for that whole day, and i believe all 3 buildings were imploded, simply due to the fact there is not enough energy to compromise the buildings structure below 10-20 floors below impact... certainly not in the way we saw it go down boom.. boom.. boom.. floor by floor at a high rate of speed, right down to the ground floor.

I'm 100% for a re-investigation on this. But at this point we have bigger things to focus on.