Well, he's NOT wrong about what the Q psyop accomplished (in a good way): i.e. preventing full out Civil War. But he apparently doesn't understand why it was done that way. I think it is his academic approach to everything where he expects things to be immediate cause followed by immediate reaction without any time shift. His thinking appears to be quite linear within the system thinking, imo. Note that many, many Deep Staters have this same mental framework problem (academia box), and this is very likely why Q was rolled out the way it was.

Per the application of the scientific method that he talks about, Q has been quite accurate with many factors more accurate data points and predictions than not. The problem may be that he doesn't know whether to use a 3,4,5, or 6 year delta for the proofs. But this is the same problem the Deep State is having. The Durham deltas for 5-12 and 5-15 alone are enough to prove that one should not doubt the Q posts. And we have more upcoming today (5-30), and possibly a 6-8 one on the way.

There is no way the Durham report release date (5-15) could have been predicted to the day four years ahead of time unless much of what is happening was pre-planned. The probability of that happening is just so, so low, especially since the Covid lockdowns interfered with the schedule and forced Durham team to work extra hard to make up for lost time (as can be gleaned from reading it).

Well, he's not wrong about what the Q psyop accomplished (in a good way): i.e. preventing full out Civil War. But he apparently doesn't understand why it was done that way. I think it is his academic approach to everything where he expects things to be immediate cause followed by immediate reaction without any time shift. His thinking appears to be quite linear within the system thinking, imo. Note that many, many Deep Staters have this same mental framework problem (academia box), and this is very likely why Q was rolled out the way it was.

Per the application of the scientific method that he talks about, Q has been quite accurate with many factors more accurate data points and predictions than not. The problem may be that he doesn't know whether to use a 3,4,5, or 6 year delta for the proofs. But this is the same problem the Deep State is having. The Durham deltas for 5-12 and 5-15 alone are enough to prove that one should not doubt the Q posts. And we have more upcoming today (5-30), and possibly a 6-8 one on the way.

There is no way the Durham report release date (5-15) could have been predicted to the day four years ahead of time unless much of what is happening was pre-planned. The probability of that happening is just so, so low, especially since the Covid lockdowns interfered with the schedule and forced Durham team to work extra hard to make up for lost time (as can be gleaned from reading it).

Well, he's not wrong about what the Q psyop accomplished (in a good way): i.e. preventing full out Civil War. But he apparently doesn't understand why it was done that way. I think it is his academic approach to everything where he expects things to be immediate cause followed by immediate reaction without any time shift. His thinking appears to be quite linear within the system thinking, imo. Note that many, many Deep Staters have this same mental framework problem (academia box), and this is very likely why Q was rolled out the way it was.

Per the application of the scientific method that he talks about, Q has been quite accurate with many factors more accurate data points and predictions than not. The problem may be that he doesn't know whether to use a 3,4,5, or 6 year delta for the proofs. But this is the same problem the Deep State is having. The Durham deltas for 5-12 and 5-15 alone are enough to prove that one should not doubt the Q posts. And we have more upcoming today (5-30), and possibly a 6-8 one on the way.

There is no way the Durham report release date (5-15) could have been predicted to the day four years ahead of time unless much of what is happening was not pre-planned. The probability of that happening is just so, so low, especially since the Covid lockdowns interfered with the schedule and forced Durham team to work extra hard to make up for lost time (as can be gleaned from reading it).

Well, he's not wrong about what the Q psyop accomplished (in a good way): i.e. preventing full out Civil War. But he apparently doesn't understand why it was done that way. I think it is his academic approach to everything where he expects things to be immediate cause followed by immediate reaction without any time shift. His thinking appears to be quite linear within the system thinking, imo.

Per the application of the scientific method that he talks about, Q has been quite accurate with many factors more accurate data points and predictions than not. The problem may be that he doesn't know whether to use a 3,4,5, or 6 year delta for the proofs. But this is the same problem the Deep State is having. The Durham deltas for 5-12 and 5-15 alone are enough to prove that one should not doubt the Q posts. And we have more upcoming today (5-30), and possibly a 6-8 one on the way.

There is no way the Durham report release date (5-15) could have been predicted to the day four years ahead of time unless much of what is happening was not pre-planned. The probability of that happening is just so, so low, especially since the Covid lockdowns interfered with the schedule and forced Durham team to work extra hard to make up for lost time (as can be gleaned from reading it).

Well, he's not wrong about what the Q psyop accomplished (in a good way): i.e. preventing full out Civil War. But he apparently doesn't understand why it was done that way. I think it is his academic approach to everything where he expects things to be immediate cause followed by immediate reaction without any time shift. His thinking appears to be quite linear within the system thinking, imo.

Per the application of the scientific method that he talks about, Q has been quite accurate with many factors more accurate data points and predictions than not. The problem may be that he doesn't know whether to use a 3,4,5, or 6 year delta for the proofs. But this is the same problem the Deep State is having. The Durham deltas for 5-12 and 5-15 alone are enough to prove that one should not doubt the Q posts. And we have more upcoming today (5-30), and possibly a 6-8 one on the way.