It is exceptionally difficult to land an aircraft with no glideslope indicators. Modern aircraft and airports have several redundant systems. Flight 77 which 'hit' the Pentagon had NONE of those.
It had no localizer beam which tells the pilot if they are high/low or right/left It had no Visual Glideslope Indicators like VASI or PAPI which tell the pilot using white/red lights if they are high or low. It had no GPS for RNAV.
Not only was the story of a half trained 'pilot' making a near impossible 'landing' into the pentagon unbelievable by itself, it is then compounded by the speed of the 'landing' aircraft. It was supposedly traveling at 530 mph, far beyond the normal landing speeds of any aircraft, thereby making any kind of visual adjustments into the target impossible. In fact that speed is far beyond the Vne (never exceed velocity) of that aircraft (757) at that low altitude.
A half trained 'pilot' with no glideslope indicators could never hit that target at that speed. A veteran pilot with 30,000 hours could not hit that target at that speed. But we are asked to believe that three rank amateurs all pulled it off without fail?
What they want us to believe is not only impossible, it requires us to believe several stacked and nested impossibilities.
It is exceptionally difficult to land an aircraft with no glideslope indicators. Modern aircraft and airports have several redundant systems. Flight 77 which 'hit' the Pentagon had NONE of those.
It had no localizer beam which tells the pilot if they are high/low or right/left It had no Visual Glideslope Indicators like VASI or PAPI which tell the pilot using white/red lights if they are high or low. It had no GPS for RNAV.
Not only was the story of a half trained 'pilot' making a near impossible 'landing' into the pentagon unbelievable by itself, it is then compounded by the speed of the 'landing' aircraft. It was supposedly traveling at 530 mph, far beyond the normal landing speeds of any aircraft, thereby making any kind of visual adjustments into the target impossible. In fact that speed is far beyond the Vne (never exceed velocity) of that aircraft (757) at that low altitude.
A half trained 'pilot' with no glideslope indicators could never hit that target at that speed. A veteran pilot with 30,000 hours could not hit that target at that speed. But we are sked to believe that three rank amateurs all pulled it off without fail?
What they want us to believe is not only impossible, it requires us to believe several stacked and nested impossibilities.