So wait, you are saying that amendments cover every possible change in circumstances, no matter how big and no one has ever switched from, say, an LLC to a Inc ?

You are just being obtuse. I'm not sure why, but it is obvious you don't want to engage in what I am actually saying.

You are confusing the fact that the constitution was signed by a "subset of people" to "US has always been controlled by private entities"

I am "confusing" nothing. Those are two separate issues (though they are related in that they both have the same origin). It was both created by a subset of people on behalf of everyone, in a way that they had no choice but to agree, AND it has always been controlled by private entities (thus my note on the difference between "in theory," and "in practice").

Some of these forces were "good" and some were "bad" in very simplistic terms

Maybe, maybe not. My research suggests that all such entities (British parliament, French revolution, etc.) were all done specifically to create the exact entities we got, to lead us out of the Monarchies, into a One World Government. The "good" and "bad" were really just "worse" and "worser." It was designed by an aristocracy for the aristocracy. It was about the Aristocracy over The Crown. It was never about "We The People," that was the pretense.

with a couple wars and a LOT of other major shenanigans, finally managed to get to the point of just being within the reach of full enslavement, 250 years later.

I suggest there is a great deal you are missing. I highly recommend reading the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Regardless of it's origin, it lays out very clearly that what we think of as "good" was not "good" at all, rather it was subversive by a subtle fuckery so insidious that it is difficult to appreciate until you really dig in. And just in case you didn't know, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was "debunked" by Allen Dulles. If you know who Allen Dulles is, you will appreciate the irony there.

So wait, you are saying that amendments cover every possible change in circumstances, no matter how big and no one has ever switched from, say, an LLC to a Inc ?

You are just being obtuse. I'm not sure why, but it is obvious you don't want to engage in what I am actually saying.

You are confusing the fact that the constitution was signed by a "subset of people" to "US has always been controlled by private entities"

I am "confusing" nothing. Those are two separate issues (though they are related in that they both have the same origin). It was both created by a subset of people on behalf of everyone, whether they agreed or not, in a way that they had no choice but to agree, AND it has always been controlled by private entities (thus my note on the difference between "in theory," and "in practice").

Some of these forces were "good" and some were "bad" in very simplistic terms

Maybe, maybe not. My research suggests that all such entities (British parliament, French revolution, etc.) were all done specifically to create the exact entities we got, to lead us out of the Monarchies, into a One World Government. The "good" and "bad" were really just "worse" and "worser." It was designed by an aristocracy for the aristocracy. It was about the Aristocracy over The Crown. It was never about "We The People," that was the pretense.

with a couple wars and a LOT of other major shenanigans, finally managed to get to the point of just being within the reach of full enslavement, 250 years later.

I suggest there is a great deal you are missing. I highly recommend reading the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Regardless of it's origin, it lays out very clearly that what we think of as "good" was not "good" at all, rather it was subversive by a subtle fuckery so insidious that it is difficult to appreciate until you really dig in. And just in case you didn't know, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was "debunked" by Allen Dulles. If you know who Allen Dulles is, you will appreciate the irony there.

So wait, you are saying that amendments cover every possible change in circumstances, no matter how big and no one has ever switched from, say, an LLC to a Inc ?

You are just being obtuse. I'm not sure why, but it is obvious you don't want to engage in what I am actually saying.

You are confusing the fact that the constitution was signed by a "subset of people" to "US has always been controlled by private entities"

I am "confusing" nothing. Those are two separate issues (though they are related in that they both have the same origin). It was both created by a subset of people on behalf of everyone, whether they agreed or not, in a way that they had no choice but to agree, AND it has always been controlled by private entities (thus my note on the difference between "in theory," and "in practice").

Some of these forces were "good" and some were "bad" in very simplistic terms

Maybe, maybe not. My research suggests that all such entities (British parliament, French revolution, etc.) were all done specifically to create the exact entities we got, to lead us out of the Monarchies, into a One World Government. The "good" and "bad" were really just "worse" and "worser." It was designed by an aristocracy for the aristocracy. It was about the Aristocracy over The Crown. It was never about "We The People."

with a couple wars and a LOT of other major shenanigans, finally managed to get to the point of just being within the reach of full enslavement, 250 years later.

I suggest there is a great deal you are missing. I highly recommend reading the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Regardless of it's origin, it lays out very clearly that what we think of as "good" was not "good" at all, rather it was subversive by a subtle fuckery so insidious that it is difficult to appreciate until you really dig in. And just in case you didn't know, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was "debunked" by Allen Dulles. If you know who Allen Dulles is, you will appreciate the irony there.

So wait, you are saying that amendments cover every possible change in circumstances, no matter how big and no one has ever switched from, say, an LLC to a Inc ?

You are just being obtuse. I'm not sure why, but it is obvious you don't want to engage in what I am actually saying.

You are confusing the fact that the constitution was signed by a "subset of people" to "US has always been controlled by private entities"

I am "confusing" nothing. Those are two separate issues (though they are related in that they both have the same origin). It was both created by a subset of people on behalf of everyone, whether they agreed or not, IN A WAY that they had no choice but to agree, AND it has always been controlled by private entities (thus my note on the difference between "in theory," and "in practice").

Some of these forces were "good" and some were "bad" in very simplistic terms

Maybe, maybe not. My research suggests that all such entities (British parliament, French revolution, etc.) were all done specifically to create the exact entities we got, to lead us out of the Monarchies, into a One World Government. The "good" and "bad" were really just "worse" and "worser." It was designed by an aristocracy for the aristocracy. It was about the Aristocracy over The Crown. It was never about "We The People."

with a couple wars and a LOT of other major shenanigans, finally managed to get to the point of just being within the reach of full enslavement, 250 years later.

I suggest there is a great deal you are missing. I highly recommend reading the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Regardless of it's origin, it lays out very clearly that what we think of as "good" was not "good" at all, rather it was subversive by a subtle fuckery so insidious that it is difficult to appreciate until you really dig in. And just in case you didn't know, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was "debunked" by Allen Dulles. If you know who Allen Dulles is, you will appreciate the irony there.

So wait, you are saying that amendments cover every possible change in circumstances, no matter how big and no one has ever switched from, say, an LLC to a Inc ?

You are just being obtuse. I'm not sure why, but it is obvious you don't want to engage in what I am actually saying.

You are confusing the fact that the constitution was signed by a "subset of people" to "US has always been controlled by private entities"

I am "confusing" nothing. Those are two separate issues (though they are related in that they both have the same origin). It was both created by a subset of people on behalf of everyone, whether they agreed or not, IN A WAY that they had no choice but to agree, AND it has always been controlled by private entities (thus my note on the difference between "in theory," and "in practice").

Some of these forces were "good" and some were "bad" in very simplistic terms

Maybe, maybe not. My research suggests that all such entities (British parliament, French revolution, etc.) were all done specifically to create the exact entities we got. The "good" and "bad" were really just "worse" and "worser." It was designed by an aristocracy for the aristocracy. It was about the Aristocracy over The Crown. It was never about "We The People."

with a couple wars and a LOT of other major shenanigans, finally managed to get to the point of just being within the reach of full enslavement, 250 years later.

I suggest there is a great deal you are missing. I highly recommend reading the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Regardless of it's origin, it lays out very clearly that what we think of as "good" was not "good" at all, rather it was subversive by a subtle fuckery so insidious that it is difficult to appreciate until you really dig in. And just in case you didn't know, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was "debunked" by Allen Dulles. If you know who Allen Dulles is, you will appreciate the irony there.