The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a social construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common modern interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source (AKA Sophia, the original meaning of "the Word of God") from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property without any need for pretense, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place). If there had been an explicit statement of "property" in the DoI, things like property taxes, or income taxes, would have been a much more difficult sell. Without property taxes and income taxes there can be no bank loans. Thus, property was left off the list.

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common modern interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source (AKA Sophia, the original meaning of "the Word of God") from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property without any need for pretense, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place). If there had been an explicit statement of "property" in the DoI, things like property taxes, or income taxes, would have been a much more difficult sell. Without property taxes and income taxes there can be no bank loans. Thus, property was left off the list.

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common modern interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source (AKA Sophia, the original meaning of "the word of God") from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property without any need for pretense, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place). If there had been an explicit statement of "property" in the DoI, things like property taxes, or income taxes, would have been a much more difficult sell. Without property taxes and income taxes there can be no bank loans. Thus, property was left off the list.

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source (AKA Sophia, the original meaning of "the word of God") from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property without any need for pretense, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place). If there had been an explicit statement of "property" in the DoI, things like property taxes, or income taxes, would have been a much more difficult sell. Without property taxes and income taxes there can be no bank loans. Thus, property was left off the list.

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived (or even perhaps Sophia, the original meaning of "the word of God"), then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property without any need for pretense, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place). If there had been an explicit statement of "property" in the DoI, things like property taxes, or income taxes, would have been a much more difficult sell. Without property taxes and income taxes there can be no bank loans. Thus, property was left off the list.

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property without any need for pretense, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place). If there had been an explicit statement of "property" in the DoI, things like property taxes, or income taxes, would have been a much more difficult sell. Without property taxes and income taxes there can be no bank loans. Thus, property was left off the list.

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property without any need for pretense, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world, using Law Magic, without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason, there is no "national security" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything and you plan centuries in advance.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need (requirement) for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This also is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals. It was "brilliant" in the sense that it sold The Big Lie to whole world without most people seeing it.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way over 250 years ago.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.

The sovereignty of the individual is not derived from Constitution. It is derived from Common Law which is derived from the word of God. Hence, the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

Sovereignty is not derived from Common Law. Common Law is a human construct and has nothing to do with who the Ultimate Authority of each person is. Nor is it derived from the word of God, if by "word" you mean the Bible (which is the most common interpretation of that term). If by "word" you mean the Intelligence of Source from which We are derived, then I agree.

But any debate on the source of our Sovereignty is irrelevant in this context because of your next sentence.

the starting point in the Declaration of Independance, where this point is established beyond any doubt:

The Sovereignty of the individual was not "established beyond any doubt" in the DoI. On the contrary, there was a purposeful omission in it; to wit, property. The Right of Property was purposefully left off the list, which then left open the door for the Constitution to make the claim for all property, which is exactly what it did (see the end of the fifth amendment e.g., though that is not the only place).

In addition to this glaring and purposeful omission, the DoI is not law. It has nothing to do with the law we actually got (Constitution). It was a flowery introduction, created in an explicitly separate document, that did not in any way affect our system of government, except as possibly inspiration for some of the people along the way. The Government we actually got is the actual Laws contained in the Constitution. The DoI is nothing when it comes to actual implementation of Law, and thus the System of Governance.

This is the modus operandi of the Cabal. Create a packaging (DoI) and then put the opposite of what the packaging says within the package itself. That is exactly what the Constitution is. It is the opposite of the DoI, by Law.

The constitution then comes into picture to put limits on what a Government can and cannot do.

This is what we are told the Constitution did, and in a way it did, except that it contained within it no actual limits on the reach of the Government through the ability to add amendments to it, which was completely unnecessary (at least potentially, with a different document/form of government). It also made explicit claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. Just read the 5th amendment, since it is the most obvious proof of that. There are quite a few other places contained within the original doc, and the amendments that are also clearly such Jurisdictional violations on the Individual in contradiction to the flowery words of the DoI, but the fifth amendment is so blatantly obvious, I don't even need to further explain the fuckery, so I use it as my "go to proof." Just read it. It is nothing but Jurisdictional violations, declaring the Government Sovereign in absolute terms, explicitly stating that our "unalienable Rights [of] Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" are subject to the whims of the people who run the Government. It also lays explicit claim on all property.

Once you read the Protocols of Zion, and you understand that it is at least possible that the Cabal created all the worlds governments that we have today, and they created the DoI (packaging) and the Constitution (contents of the package), everything makes sense.

We have the government we have because the Cabal had the plan to take us to where we are today. That is why it was created with fuckery, that is why it had flowery words as "spirit." that is why there were very important omissions (property), that is why things proceeded as they did to today. It was planned that way.

Declaration of Independence + Constitution, for all their shortcomings, is one of the pinnacles of Human brilliance.

This is what we are told. This is one of those "repeat the lie enough times and it becomes truth" things. The Constitution made explicit claims for Government as Sovereign, and all citizens as vassals.

Beyond this, there is nothing else you can do to keep people safe.

This is what we are told. This is also a lie. There is no need for a government to ever make claims on the Jurisdiction of the Individual. There is no "safety" reason, there is no "protection of Rights" reason. Fraudulent claims on Jurisdiction are done for one reason and one reason only, because someone wants to Rule.

People own the responsibility to claim their rights. Only they can do it. As long as people are ignorant, the Evil can always trick them into giving away their rights.

I agree, but it is trivially easy to trick people if you own everything.

Hence, Great Awakening. The rights have always been there ever since Humanity was created. Great Awakening is how not only will we all understand this, but we will never forget it even in future (hence the Precipice).

Agreed.