Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your definitions there they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a reoffending drug charge or petty theft charge). They have a justification that they are being legitimately attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
Obviously BLM riots are not "rightwing" and you are incorrect. Even if you are justified and are responding to an attack, you are not right wing. The Right chiefly refers a specific ideology, not the things you are making up.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your definitions there they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a reoffending drug charge or petty theft charge). They have a justification that they are being legitimately attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
Obviously BLM riots are not "rightwing" and you are incorrect. Even if you are justified and are responding to an attack, you are not right wing. The Right chiefly refers a specific ideology, not the stupid shit you are making up.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your definitions there they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a reoffending drug charge or petty theft charge). They have a justification that they are being legitimately attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
Obviously BLM riots are not "rightwing" and you are incorrect. Even if you are justified and are responding to an attack, you are not right wing. The Right is chiefly a specific ideology, not the stupid shit you are making up.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your definitions there they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a reoffending drug charge). They have a justification that they are being legitimately attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a reoffending drug charge). They have a justification that they are being legitimately attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a reoffending drug charge). They have a justification that they are being attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done (ie. years imprisonment for a drug charge). They have a justification that they are being attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with disproportional punishments to what was done. They have a justification that they are being attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, perhaps with punishments over the line. They have a justification that they are being attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves. They have a justification that they are being attacked and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves. They have a justification and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves. They have a justification and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves. They have a justification. and are responding. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, but they have a justification. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and store thieves, but they have a justification. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and thieves, but they have a justification. Those must be rightwing heroes according to your definition.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
BLM riots were justified with the claim that society is against them and they are actively being oppressed, which might be true that society oppresses druggies and thieves, but they have a justification. Those must be rightwing heroes, huh.
In many cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries against Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own reasoning they must all be rightwing.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries on Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own claim they must all be rightwing.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and conspired an international economic boycott with various countries on Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own claim they must all be rightwing.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and economic boycott on Germany well before any physical conflict happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own claim they must all be rightwing.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and economic boycott on Germany well before any physical conflict or genocide happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own claim they must all be rightwing. You are going to have to define that a bit more.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War and economic boycott on Germany well before any physical conflict or genocide happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own claim they must all be rightwing. You are going to have to define that a bit more.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War on Germany well before any physical conflict or genocide happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own claim they must all be rightwing. You are going to have to define that a bit more.
In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War on Hitler well before any physical conflict or genocide happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
You are going to have to define that a bit more. In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War on Hitler well before any physical conflict or genocide happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.
Most groups feel they are justified in their actions of using force, and are "responding". By your own claim they must all be rightwing.
You are going to have to define that a bit more. In most cases it is a slowly escalating issue and debatable about who initiated conflict and if the response was proportional or appropriate. The Jews initiated a Holy War on Hitler well before any physical conflict or genocide happened, for example, and played innocent victim when they were punched back.