It's impossible in my head they are the same being. Raised in and now 30+ years of Church hearing of 2 separate beings / personalities. If 'Father' and 'Son' were one why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of MY FATHER' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). Verse 50 even states Joseph didn't understand what young Jesus did. Guess agree to disagree based on Christian Sectarian differences..

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. Raised in and now 30+ years of Church hearing of 2 separate beings / personalities. If 'Father' and 'Son' were one why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of MY FATHER' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). Verse 50 even states Joseph didn't understand what young Jesus did. Guess agree to disagree based on Christian Sectarian differences..

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. Raised in and now 30+ years of Church hearing of 2 separate beings / personalities. If 'Father' and 'Son' were one why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). Verse 50 even states Joseph didn't understand what young Jesus did. Guess agree to disagree based on Christian Sectarian differences..

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. Raised in and now 30+ years of Church hearing of 2 separate beings / personalities. If 'Father' and 'Son' were one why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). Verse 50 even states Joseph didn't understand what young Jesus did. Guess agree to disagree based on Christian sectarian differences..

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. Raised in and now 30+ years of Church hearing of 2 separate beings / personalities. If 'Father' and 'Son' were one why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). Verse 50 even states Joseph didn't understand what young Jesus did. I get people think this but.. agree to disagree I suppose.

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. It's the way I was raised now 30+ years of Church of 2 separate beings / personalities. If 'Father' and 'Son' were one why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). Verse 50 even states Joseph didn't understand what young Jesus did. I get people think this but.. agree to disagree I suppose.

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. It's the way I was raised now 30+ years of Church of 2 separate beings / personalities. It's difficult to wrap my head around 'Father' and 'Son' being one. Why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). Verse 50 even states Joseph didn't understand what young Jesus did. I get people think this but.. agree to disagree I suppose.

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. It's the way I was raised now 30+ years of Church of 2 separate beings / personalities. It's difficult to wrap my head around 'Father' and 'Son' being one. Why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). I get people think this but.. agree to disagree I suppose.

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. It's the way I was raised now 30+ years of Church of 2 separate beings / personalities. It's difficult to wrap my head around 'Father' and 'Son' being one. Why the distinction. Why did Jesus tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was missing as a youth in Jerusalem (Luke 2:49). I get it but I don't.

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. It's the way I was raised now 30+ years of Church of 2 separate beings / personalities. It's difficult to wrap my head around 'Father' and 'Son' being one. Why the distinction. Why did he tell Joseph he was 'At the house of his Father' when he was a kid lost (Luke 2:49). I get it but I don't.

It's impossible in my head they are the same being. It's the way I was raised now 30+ years of Church of 2 separate beings / personalities. It's difficult to wrap my head around 'Father' and 'Son' being one.