- What I intended to say was: One man, One woman, One lifetime to the exclusion of all other options. Thank you for catching that!
By your tone you seem to have a problem with Willis or what he wrote in the linked essay. What’s the problem?
- I have no problem with Perry Willis, I actually agree with his conclusion here:
If you restrict coercion to the enforcement of social morality, you can still use persuasion to promote your personal values. Isn’t that the correct path? Isn’t peaceful persuasion the only socially moral way to promote your personal morality?“
He is absolutely right here, and it lines up with how Jesus treated the woman caught in adultery, often the biggest stone- throwers are also the biggest hypocrites. I normally don't post links to sites, then complement the authors, when I have a bone to pick with them...I personally think he has a higher standard of morals than any Neo-cons (especially war-mongers), Christian or not.
I fully agree on the rest of your point as well.
- What I intended to say was: One man, One woman, One lifetime to the exclusion of all other options. Thank you for catching that!
By your tone you seem to have a problem with Willis or what he wrote in the linked essay. What’s the problem?
- I have no problem with Perry Willis, I actually agree with his conclusion here:
If you restrict coercion to the enforcement of social morality, you can still use persuasion to promote your personal values. Isn’t that the correct path? Isn’t peaceful persuasion the only socially moral way to promote your personal morality?“
He is absolutely right here, and it lines up with how Jesus treated the woman caught in adultery, often the biggest stone- throwers are also the biggest hypocrites. Frankly, I normally don't post links to sites, then complement the authors, when I have a bone to pick with them...I personally think he has a higher standard of morals than any Neo-cons (especially war-mongers), Christian or not.
I fully agree on the rest of your point as well.