I'm responding to an aspect of the 9/11 Inside Job, posted by the OP. The CGI 'theory' is one of the most obnoxious and unproven out there. As you can see, I've already gone much, much further in explaining my theory than others in the thread. You don't seem nearly as concerned about their lack of evidence or yours, if you believe there were no planes and CGI was used. I have posted extensively about 9/11 over the last 20+ years on multiple forums. And I actually do appreciate this discussion we are having.
You do have the gist of the execution. Systems were switched over during the targeting phase ( flight termination ). Transponders were turned off, allowing flight plan path to remain undetermined. ie. we have no idea where they came from. Final laser targeting could have been either ground or air based. It was one or the other. Was it the Dancing Israelis? I always wondered about that. The E-Team art project, a group of Israelis that had access to the buildings for nearly a year, erected their 'art installation' within FEET of Flight 11 impact point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPOsF86oNoQ // I would consider that coincidence a very smokey gun.
As for the engines, I said 'more powerful', not necessarily larger. Zakheim had an existing contract with the Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fuel tankers. Engine upgrades would have been anticipated for increased loads and Military spec. A 767 is significantly larger than a 737, also.
I don't consider the 'tilt' extraordinary and I don't understand how it's evidence of CGI. Anyway, the plane ( drone ) potentially encountered a small turbulence associated with the building or it was a slight, last second adjustment of the computerized flight control system.
I'm responding to an aspect of the 9/11 Inside Job, posted by the OP. The CGI 'theory' is one of the most obnoxious and unproven out there. As you can see, I've already gone much, much further in explaining my theory than others in the thread. You don't seem nearly as concerned about their lack of evidence or yours, if you believe there were no planes and CGI was used. I have posted extensively about 9/11 over the last 20+ years on multiple forums. And I actually do appreciate this discussion we are having.
You do have the gist of the execution. Systems were switched over during the targeting phase ( flight termination ). Transponders were turned off, allowing flight plan path to remain undetermined. ie. we have no idea where they came from. Final laser targeting could have been either ground or air based. It was one or the other. Was it the Dancing Israelis? I always wondered about that. The E-Team art project, a group of Israelis that had access to the buildings for nearly a year, erected their 'art installation' within FEET of Flight 11 impact point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPOsF86oNoQ // I would consider that coincidence a very smokey gun.
As for the engines, I said 'more powerful', not necessarily larger. Zakheim had an existing contract with the Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fuel tankers. Engine upgrades would have been anticipated for increased loads and Military spec. A 767 is significantly larger than a 737, also.
I don't consider the 'tilt' as unordinary and I don't understand how it's evidence of CGI. Anyway, the plane ( drone ) potentially encountered a small turbulence associated with the building or it was a slight, last second adjustment of the computerized flight control system.
I'm responding to an aspect of the 9/11 Inside Job, posted by the OP. The CGI 'theory' is one of the most obnoxious and unproven out there. As you can see, I've already gone much, much further in explaining my theory than others in the thread. You don't seem nearly as concerned about their lack of evidence or yours, if you believe there were no planes and CGI was used. I have posted extensively about 9/11 over the last 20+ years on multiple forums. And I actually do appreciate this discussion we are having.
You do have the gist of the execution. Systems were switched over during the targeting phase ( flight termination ). Transponders were turned off, allowing flight plan path to remain undetermined. ie. we have no idea where they came from. Final laser targeting could have been either ground or air based. It was one or the other. Was it the Dancing Israelis? I always wondered about that. The E-Team art project, a group of Israelis that had access to the buildings for nearly a year, erected their 'art installation' within FEET of Flight 11 impact point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPOsF86oNoQ // I would consider that coincidence a very smokey gun.
As for the engines, I said 'more powerful', not necessarily larger. Zakheim had an existing contract with the Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fuel tankers. Engine upgrades would have been anticipated for increased loads and Military spec. A 767 is significantly larger than a 737, also.
I don't consider the 'tilt' as unordinary and I don't understand if how this is evidence of CGI. Anyway, the plane ( drone ) potentially encountered a small turbulence associated with the building or it was a slight, last second adjustment of the computerized flight control system.