If you consider the possibility that we are in 5G war, and in fact a psyop war, then you have to also consider that certain people are playing roles. In other words, they are presenting characters and perspectives in order to generate narratives, narratives that wake people up, that expose and disclose the nature of the matrix behind the scenes.

It seems to me that like Musk, Tucker's role here is NOT to be maga, or to be a trump supporter. It's to present a perspective and viewpoint that is accessible to those who are NOT maga, for example. All of those people out there in midway land.

What about DJT? DJT is most certainly playing a role. His role is to rally the American public centering on freedom and truth, but that takes time. Another role is to bait the DS into doing exactly what he wants them to do, causing them to set up precedents and templates that backfire on them.

Example, the indictments. Now, the concept of indicting former presidents, something that would have been inconceivable 6 years ago, is now very conceivable, and therefore more believable and more acceptable to many more millions of Americans.

But Trump is not guilty, and the indictments are very likely to go nowhere. Even if he were convicted, it would only enhance his influence. But, when indictments come down of other former presidents, or high figures like secretary of state, well, a LOT more Americans are going to find the idea at least comprehensible.

When I watch Tucker, I'm not asking myself "what does tucker REALLY think and what are his motive or beliefs?". I ask myself: "what role is tucker playing in the entire scheme of things, and who might he be able to affect, influence, and educate?" "What audience does he appear to be targeting?"

If you consider the possibility that we are in 5G war, and in fact a psyop war, then you have to also consider that certain people are playing roles. In other words, they are presenting characters and perspectives in order to generate narratives, narratives that wake people up, that expose and disclose the nature of the matrix behind the scenes.

It seems to me that like Musk, Tucker's role here is NOT to be maga, or to be a trump supporter. It's to present a perspective and viewpoint that is accessible to those who are NOT maga, for example. All of those people out there in midway land.

What about DJT? DJT is most certainly playing a role. His role is to rally the American public centering on freedom and truth, but that takes time. Another role is to bait the DS into doing exactly what he wants them to do, causing them to set up precedents and templates that backfire on them.

Example, the indictments. Now, the concept of indicting former presidents, something that would have been inconceivable 6 years ago, is now very conceivable, and therefore more believable and more acceptable to many more millions of Americans.

But Trump is not guilty, and the indictments are very likely to go nowhere. Even if he were convicted, it would only enhance his influence. But, when indictments come down of other former presidents, or high figures like secretary of state, well, a LOT more Americans are going to find the idea at least comprehensible.

When I watch Tucker, I'm not asking myself "what does tucker REALLY think and what are his motive or beliefs?". I ask myself: "what role is tucker playing in the entire scheme of things, and who might he be able to affect, influence, and educate?"

If you consider the possibility that we are in 5G war, and in fact a psyop war, then you have to also consider that certain people are playing roles. In other words, they are presenting characters and perspectives in order to generate narratives, narratives that wake people up, that expose and disclose the nature of the matrix behind the scenes.

It seems to me that like Musk, Tucker's role here is NOT to be maga, or to be a trump supporter. It's to present a perspective and viewpoint that is accessible to those who are NOT maga, for example. All of those people out there in midway land.

What about DJT? DJT is most certainly playing a role. His role is to rally the American public centering on freedom and truth, but that takes time. Another role is to bait the DS into doing exactly what he wants them to do, causing them to set up precedents and templates that backfire on them.

Example, the indictments. Now, the concept of indicting former presidents, something that would have been inconceivable 6 years ago, is now very conceivable, and therefore more believable and more acceptable to many more millions of Americans.

But Trump is not guilty, and the indictments are very likely to go nowhere. But, when indictments come down of other former presidents, or high figures like secretary of state, well, a LOT more Americans are going to find the idea at least comprehensible.

When I watch Tucker, I'm not asking myself "what does tucker REALLY think and what are his motive or beliefs?". I ask myself: "what role is tucker playing in the entire scheme of things, and who might he be able to affect, influence, and educate?"

If you consider the possibility that we are in 5G war, and in fact a psyop war, then you have to also consider that certain people are playing roles. In other words, they are presenting characters and perspectives in order to generate narratives, narratives that wake people up, that expose and disclose the nature of the matrix behind the scenes.

It seems to me that like Musk, Tucker's role here is NOT to be maga, or to be a trump supporter. It's to present a perspective and viewpoint that is accessible to those who are NOT maga, for example. All of those people out there in midway land.

What about DJT? DJT is most certainly playing a role. His role is to rally the American public centering on freedom and truth, but that takes time. Another role is to bait the DS into doing exactly what he wants them to do, causing them to set up precedents and templates that backfire on them.

Example, the indictments. Now, the concept of indicting former president, something that would have been inconceivable 6 years ago, is now very conceivable, and therefore more believable and more acceptable to many more millions of Americans.

But Trump is not guilty, and the indictments are very likely to go nowhere. But, when indictments come down of other former presidents, or high figures like secretary of state, well, a LOT more Americans are going to find the idea at least comprehensible.

When I watch Tucker, I'm not asking myself "what does tucker REALLY think and what are his motive or beliefs?". I ask myself: "what role is tucker playing in the entire scheme of things, and who might he be able to affect, influence, and educate?"