My point was that when you see these BS articles such as these, there are some comms.
So, here goes.
Water = money
Groundwater = concerns for the most fundamental aspects of humanity: poverty, hunger, security. On other words, money for survival. Money belonging to the people.
Also: money makes the world go round. duh, at the simple correlation.
When they talk about water re=distribution, they are talking about wealth redistribution. they mention:
water was redistributed in western North America and northwestern India.
So, they are identifying where all the 'money' went, geographically. The hive of criminality, in other words - those countries were stealing from the starving world masses.
Also,
data is available dates back to the late 19th century,
So, the roots of corruption go deep, and far back. What happened in the late 19th Century? Who were the robber barons who set up the machinations of stealing wealth from the entire world? Apart from the Crimean War (1850s) which was a complete disaster, start with the Boer War (late 19th C) when the Brits first effectively used concentration camps for innocent women and children - and trench warfare. The lie was that the Boers were 'aggressive' - but they had been there for hundreds of years, intermarried with the Khoi San, and had armed themselves because they perceived the threat of the imperialist Brits. But really, they had found gold and diamonds in land that was deemed to be unproductive (how dared they), so, the 'Crown' wanted that wealth. The Brits had previously occupied the lush coastal properties and harbors. This set up the modus operandi of defeating people who did not want to hand over their wealth.
Then progress to WW1, and the lies. What was really happening was that the 'powers' were fighting over where to draw the 'borders' for their imperialist machinations. Note that in Africa, those lines are weirdly straight - straight through tribal lands, causing some tribes to suddenly be part of a hostile country. Belgium was forged out of a pice of Holland, and a piece of France. Where is the seat of the EU - Oh Brussels, at the behest of Washington. But I digress.
And, 'polar motion' could be talking about the balance of power, poles being diametrically opposed systems, such as it was when there was the US system, and the USSR, during the Cold War. There is talk about a 'multipolar world' coming in, with the formation of BRICS. So, they are talking about a polar shift, away from Washington.
My point was that when you see these BS articles such as these, there are some comms.
So, here goes.
Water = money
Groundwater = concerns for the most fundamental aspects of humanity: poverty, hunger, security. On other words, money for survival. Money belonging to the people.
Also: money makes the world go round. duh, at the simple correlation.
When they talk about water re=distribution, they are talking about wealth redistribution. they mention:
water was redistributed in western North America and northwestern India.
So, they are identifying where all the 'money' went, geographically. The hive of criminality, in other words - those countries were stealing from the starving world masses.
Also,
data is available dates back to the late 19th century,
So, the roots of corruption go deep, and far back. What happened in the late 19th Century? Who were the robber barons who set up the machinations of stealing wealth from the entire world? Start with the Boer War - when the Brits first used concentration camps for innocent women and children - and trench warfare. The lie was that the Boers were 'aggressive' - but they had been there for hundreds of years, and had armed themselves because they perceived the threat of the imperialist Brits. But really, they had found gold and diamonds in land that was deemed to be unproductive, so, the 'Crown' wanted that wealth, The Brits had previously occupied the lush coastal properties and harbors.
Then progress to WW1, and the lies. What was really happening was that the 'powers' were fighting over where to draw the 'borders' for their imperialist machinations. Note that in Africa, those lines are weirdly straight - straight through tribal lands, causing some tribes to suddenly be part of a hostile country. But I digress.
And, 'polar motion' could be talking about the balance of power, poles being diametrically opposed systems, such as it was when there was the US system, and the USSR, during the Cold War. There is talk about a 'multipolar world' coming in, with the formation of BRICS. So, they are talking about a polar shift, away from Washington.