Here's the action history of the page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&action=history
sometime on July 7, someone edited the page and inserted the photo, which was quickly reverted. So, it's hard to say "Wikipedia chose...". Actually, Wikipedia chose to NOT use this photo.
Here's the actual edit inserting the Levine photo:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&diff=prev&oldid=1163890667
Here is the edit back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&diff=1163987938&oldid=1163890667
The exchanges on the editing are ..... well, we know how lunatic the LGBTQI brainwashed are...
The user (mistyjee) who edited in the Levine photo was registered on July 6. Obviously, with the express person of posting the levine image on the WOMAN page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mistyjee&action=history
One long time editing account at the wiki (Mr Pyles) recorded "reversed photo vandalism" talking about what the Mistyjee account did.
Here's the action history of the page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&action=history
sometime on July 7, someone edited the page and inserted the photo, which was quickly reverted. So, it's hard to say "Wikipedia chose...". Actually, Wikipedia chose to NOT use this photo.
Here's the actual edit inserting the Levine photo:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&diff=prev&oldid=1163890667
Here is the edit back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&diff=1163987938&oldid=1163890667
The exchanges on the editing are ..... well, we know how lunatic the LGBTQI brainwashed are...
Here's the action history of the page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman&action=history
sometime on July 7, someone edited the page and inserted the photo, which was quickly reverted. So, it's hard to say "Wikipedia chose...". Actually, Wikipedia chose to NOT use this photo.
@catsfive
Dude, really? Did you even vet this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman
Surely we don't need more clickbait bullsh*te here. Come on. I don't know this Oli London guy. Maybe he's a disonfo clickbaiter, or maybe he just doesn't know how to vet anything or do anything more than copy/paste something that triggers his biases, but WE should.
This image is EL FAKO. A quick perusal of the actual wiki entry confirms this, plus a few quick clicks on the wayback machine indicate it NEVER has been this.
There are hundreds of entries of this webpage at the wayback, so I'm not going to go through them all, but even three random clicks at one week back, one month back, 6 months back, and a year back show......
ZIP. NADA. El NUTHINGO.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230202091118/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman
https://web.archive.org/web/20230628083100/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman
https://web.archive.org/web/20230607075402/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman
https://web.archive.org/web/20220324014059/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman
Is it possible that someone edited the page, and posted the Levine picture? Sure. But if Wikipedia "chose" this, when was it reverted?
If someone can show an archived version with Levine, I'd be pretty surprised.
As expected, Wiki still pushes the cultural marxist woke idology. They do have an article for 'transwoman' full of the usual garbage.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220317141412/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_woman
Levine's picture is there.
Wikipedia is a cultural Marxist propaganda sheet, but we should still avoid posting clickbait nonsense, imo.