A shift in knowledge means also being efficient to make old ideas better.

What is "better"? Why is "more efficient" "better?" Who told you that?

Don't get me wrong. I have been an engineer, scientist, and computer scientist for much of my life. I've been a manager and efficiency expert. My whole life was about creating efficient systems. Did I make anything better? No, not a whit. Not a single life was enhanced by an increase in efficiency, at least not on the systems I worked on in the corporate world. I did make the corporations I worked for a whole lot of money though. So maybe I made a few fat cats a little fatter.

Having said that, I still think there is merit in the idea, but the point is, not all increases in efficiency in one place equate to a "better" overall condition. Very often, in fact I would go so far as to say, almost always (in our present system), they are work towards a worse overall system, if we include in our measurements things like the mental, physical, and spiritual health of the individuals who live in the world.

We have to ask ourselves. What is the main problem with our system?

Yes, an excellent question.

The system allows the FED to be able to loan money out of thin air.

Meh, maybe. I think the main problem is a lack of knowledge. It isn't what the FED can do, but how they are able to do it. They are only able to do it because of a lack of knowledge. If people knew they would reject the system. If allowed to progress organically, we would then transition to something else, something that came from the Gestalt of Many Minds. I suggest we would transition back to a modern version of barter. That suggestion comes from having spent the past 3 years studying the entire history of economics and Cabal fuckery through Money Magic, Law Magic, and Religion Magic (which includes Science as a religion).

If they are going to loan money. There must be a valuable asset with a ceiling of supply behind it.

Why do we need "loans" at all? For thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of years, loans, if they existed at all, were almost certainly very rare. A debt based economy is a fraud. We need loans now because of the fraud they set up as our system of "a modern economy". It is not fundamental to a working economy, but to a enslaved populace.

We don't need no stinking loans, not ever. It is a completely unnecessary system.

All we need to do is go back to before we were on the FIAT system.

I suggest your conclusion is incorrect because your assumptions are incorrect, and you are basing them on a faulty understanding of history. I don't blame you, it is hard to figure this shit out or find the evidence. It has been obfuscated purposefully to prevent us from doing so. I suggest the "Gold Backed System" is in fact Controlled Opposition. It could be a worthwhile transition to help people learn the knowledge they are currently lacking, but it is not sufficient, and will inevitably lead directly back to the same problem we have today, or perhaps the same problem we had in the 19th century (which was almost identical to the problem we had today) when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their ilk owned the whole world (they still own it today, but that was when those two families made their biggest moves to the top of the Cabal totem pole).

I suggest you read my report linked previously. It will be very enlightening to you I think.

A shift in knowledge means also being efficient to make old ideas better.

What is "better"? Why is "more efficient" "better?" Who told you that?

Don't get me wrong. I have been an engineer, scientist, and computer scientist for much of my life. I've been a manager and efficiency expert. My whole life was about creating efficient systems. Did I make anything better? No, not a whit. Not a single life was enhanced by an increase in efficiency, at least not on the systems I worked on in the corporate world. I did make the corporations I worked for a whole lot of money though. So maybe I made a few fat cats a little fatter.

Having said that, I still think there is merit in the idea, but the point is, not all increases in efficiency in one place equate to a "better" overall condition. Very often, in fact I would go so far as to say, almost always (in our present system), they are work towards a worse overall system, if we include in our measurements things like the mental, physical, and spiritual health of the individuals who live in the world.

We have to ask ourselves. What is the main problem with our system?

Yes, an excellent question.

The system allows the FED to be able to loan money out of thin air.

Meh, maybe. I think the main problem is a lack of knowledge. It isn't what the FED can do, but how they are able to do it. They are only able to do it because of a lack of knowledge. If people knew they would reject the system. If allowed to progress organically, we would then transition to something else, something that came from the Gestalt of Many Minds. I suggest we would transition back to a modern version of barter. That suggestion comes from having spent the past 3 years studying the entire history of economics and Cabal fuckery through Money Magic, Law Magic, and Religion Magic (which includes Science as a religion).

If they are going to loan money. There must be a valuable asset with a ceiling of supply behind it.

Why do we need "loans" at all? For thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of years loans, if they existed at all, were almost certainly very rare. A debt based economy is a fraud. We need loans now because of the fraud they set up as our system of "a modern economy". It is not fundamental to a working economy, but to a enslaved populace.

We don't need no stinking loans, not ever. It is a completely unnecessary system.

All we need to do is go back to before we were on the FIAT system.

I suggest your conclusion is incorrect because your assumptions are incorrect, and you are basing them on a faulty understanding of history. I don't blame you, it is hard to figure this shit out or find the evidence. It has been obfuscated purposefully to prevent us from doing so. I suggest the "Gold Backed System" is in fact Controlled Opposition. It could be a worthwhile transition to help people learn the knowledge they are currently lacking, but it is not sufficient, and will inevitably lead directly back to the same problem we have today, or perhaps the same problem we had in the 19th century (which was almost identical to the problem we had today) when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their ilk owned the whole world (they still own it today, but that was when those two families made their biggest moves to the top of the Cabal totem pole).

I suggest you read my report linked previously. It will be very enlightening to you I think.

A shift in knowledge means also being efficient to make old ideas better.

What is "better"? Why is "more efficient" "better?" Who told you that?

Don't get me wrong. I have been an engineer, scientist, and computer scientist for much of my life. I've been a manager and efficiency expert. My whole life was about creating efficient systems. Did I make anything better? No, not a whit. Not a single life was enhanced by an increase in efficiency, at least not on the systems I worked on. I did make the corporations I worked for a whole lot of money though. So maybe I made a few fat cats a little fatter.

Having said that, I still think there is merit in the idea, but the point is, not all increases in efficiency in one place equate to a "better" overall condition. Very often, in fact I would go so far as to say, almost always (in our present system), they are work towards a worse overall system, if we include in our measurements things like the mental, physical, and spiritual health of the individuals who live in the world.

We have to ask ourselves. What is the main problem with our system?

Yes, an excellent question.

The system allows the FED to be able to loan money out of thin air.

Meh, maybe. I think the main problem is a lack of knowledge. It isn't what the FED can do, but how they are able to do it. They are only able to do it because of a lack of knowledge. If people knew they would reject the system. If allowed to progress organically, we would then transition to something else, something that came from the Gestalt of Many Minds. I suggest we would transition back to a modern version of barter. That suggestion comes from having spent the past 3 years studying the entire history of economics and Cabal fuckery through Money Magic, Law Magic, and Religion Magic (which includes Science as a religion).

If they are going to loan money. There must be a valuable asset with a ceiling of supply behind it.

Why do we need "loans" at all? For thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of years loans, if they existed at all, were almost certainly very rare. A debt based economy is a fraud. We need loans now because of the fraud they set up as our system of "a modern economy". It is not fundamental to a working economy, but to a enslaved populace.

We don't need no stinking loans, not ever. It is a completely unnecessary system.

All we need to do is go back to before we were on the FIAT system.

I suggest your conclusion is incorrect because your assumptions are incorrect, and you are basing them on a faulty understanding of history. I don't blame you, it is hard to figure this shit out or find the evidence. It has been obfuscated purposefully to prevent us from doing so. I suggest the "Gold Backed System" is in fact Controlled Opposition. It could be a worthwhile transition to help people learn the knowledge they are currently lacking, but it is not sufficient, and will inevitably lead directly back to the same problem we have today, or perhaps the same problem we had in the 19th century (which was almost identical to the problem we had today) when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their ilk owned the whole world (they still own it today, but that was when those two families made their biggest moves to the top of the Cabal totem pole).

I suggest you read my report linked previously. It will be very enlightening to you I think.

A shift in knowledge means also being efficient to make old ideas better.

What is "better"? Why is "more efficient" "better?" Who told you that?

Don't get me wrong. I have been an engineer, scientist, and computer scientist for much of my life. I've been a manager and efficiency expert. My whole life was about creating efficient systems. Did I make anything better? No, not a whit. Not a single life was enhanced by an increase in efficiency, at least not on the systems I worked on. I did make the corporations I worked for a whole lot of money though. So maybe I made a few fat cats a little fatter.

Having said that, I still think there is merit in the idea, but the point is, not all increases in efficiency in one place equate to a "better" overall condition. Very often, in fact I would go so far as to say, almost always (in our present system), they are work towards a worse overall system, if we include in our measurements things like the mental, physical, and spiritual health of the individuals who live in the world.

We have to ask ourselves. What is the main problem with our system?

Yes, an excellent question.

The system allows the FED to be able to loan money out of thin air.

Meh, maybe. I think the main problem is a lack of knowledge. It isn't what the FED can do, but how they are able to do it. They are only able to do it because of a lack of knowledge. If people knew they would reject the system. If allowed to progress organically, we would then transition to something else, something that came from the Gestalt of Many Minds. I suggest we would transition back to a modern version of barter. That suggestion comes from having spent the past 3 years studying the entire history of economics and Cabal fuckery through Money Magic, Law Magic, and Religion Magic (which includes Science as a religion).

If they are going to loan money. There must be a valuable asset with a ceiling of supply behind it.

Why do we need "loans" at all? For thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of years loans, if they existed at all, were almost certainly very rare. A debt based economy is a fraud. We need loans now because of the fraud they set up as our system of "a modern economy". It is not fundamental to a working economy, but to a enslaved populace.

We don't need no stinking loans, not ever. It is a completely unnecessary system.

All we need to do is go back to before we were on the FIAT system.

I suggest your conclusion is incorrect because your assumptions are incorrect, and you are basing them on a faulty understanding of history. I don't blame you, it is hard to figure this shit out or find the evidence. It has been obfuscated purposefully to prevent us from doing so. I suggest the "Gold Backed System" is in fact Controlled Opposition. It could be a worthwhile transition, but it is not sufficient, and will inevitably lead directly back to the same problem we have today, or perhaps the same problem we had in the 19th century (which was almost identical to the problem we had today) when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their ilk owned the whole world (they still own it today, but that was when those two families made their biggest moves to the top of the Cabal totem pole).

I suggest you read my report linked previously. It will be very enlightening to you I think.

A shift in knowledge means also being efficient to make old ideas better.

What is "better"? Why is "more efficient" "better?" Who told you that?

Don't get me wrong. I have been an engineer, scientist, and computer scientist for much of my life. I've been a manager and efficiency expert. My whole life was about creating efficient systems. Did I make anything better? No, not a whit. Not a single life was enhanced by an increase in efficiency, at least not on the systems I worked on. I did make the corporations I worked for a whole lot of money though. So maybe I made a few fat cats a little fatter.

Having said that, I still think there is merit in the idea, but the point is, not all increases in efficiency in one place equate to a "better" overall condition. Very often, in fact I would go so far as to say, almost always (in our present system), they are work towards a worse overall system, if we include in our measurements things like the mental, physical, and spiritual health of the individuals who live in the world.

We have to ask ourselves. What is the main problem with our system?

Yes, an excellent question.

The system allows the FED to be able to loan money out of thin air.

Meh, maybe. I think the main problem is a lack of knowledge. It isn't what the FED can do, but how they are able to do it. They are only able to do it because of a lack of knowledge. If people knew they would reject the system. If allowed to progress organically, we would then transition to something else, something that came from the Gestalt of Many Minds. I suggest we would transition back to a modern version of barter. That suggestion comes from having spent the past 3 years studying the entire history of economics and Cabal fuckery through Money Magic, Law Magic, and Religion Magic (which includes Science as a religion).

If they are going to loan money. There must be a valuable asset with a ceiling of supply behind it.

Why do we need "loans" at all? For thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of years loans, if they existed at all, were almost certainly very rare. A debt based economy is a fraud. We need loans now because of the fraud they set up as our system of "a modern economy". It is not fundamental to a working economy, but to a enslaved populace.

We don't need no stinking loans, not ever. It is a completely unnecessary system.

All we need to do is go back to before we were on the FIAT system.

I suggest your assumptions are incorrect, and you are basing them on a faulty understanding of history. I don't blame you, it is hard to figure this shit out or find the evidence. It has been obfuscated purposefully to prevent us from doing so. I suggest the "Gold Backed System" is in fact Controlled Opposition. It could be a worthwhile transition, but it is not sufficient, and will inevitably lead directly back to the same problem we have today, or perhaps the same problem we had in the 19th century (which was almost identical to the problem we had today) when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their ilk owned the whole world (they still own it today, but that was when those two families made their biggest moves to the top of the Cabal totem pole).

I suggest you read my report linked previously. It will be very enlightening to you I think.

A shift in knowledge means also being efficient to make old ideas better.

What is "better"? Why is "more efficient" "better?" Who told you that?

Don't get me wrong. I have been an engineer, scientist, and computer scientist for much of my life. I've been a manager and efficiency expert. My whole life was about creating efficient systems. Did I make anything better? No, not a whit. Not a single life was enhanced by an increase in efficiency, at least not on the systems I worked on. I did make the corporations I worked for a whole lot of money though. So maybe I made a few fat cats a little fatter.

Having said that, I still think there is merit in the idea, but the point is, not all increases in efficiency in one place equate to a "better" overall condition. Very often, in fact I would go so far as to say, almost always (in our present system), they are work towards a worse overall system, if we include in our measurements things like the mental, physical, and spiritual health of the individuals who live in the world.

We have to ask ourselves. What is the main problem with our system?

Yes, an excellent question.

The system allows the FED to be able to loan money out of thin air.

Meh, maybe. I think the main problem is a lack of knowledge. It isn't what the FED can do, but how they are able to do it. They are only able to do it because of a lack of knowledge. If people knew they would reject the system. If allowed to progress organically, we would then transition to something else, something that came from the Gestalt of Many Minds. I suggest we would transition back to a modern version of barter. That suggestion comes from having spent the past 3 years studying the entire history of economics and Cabal fuckery through Money Magic, Law Magic, and Religion Magic (which includes Science as a religion).

If they are going to loan money. There must be a valuable asset with a ceiling of supply behind it.

Why do we need "loans" at all? For thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of years loans, if they existed at all, were almost certainly very rare. A debt based economy is a fraud. We need loans now because of the fraud. It is not fundamental to a working economy, but to a enslaved populace.

We don't need no stinking loans, not ever. It is a completely unnecessary system.

All we need to do is go back to before we were on the FIAT system.

I suggest your assumptions are incorrect, and you are basing them on a faulty understanding of history. I don't blame you, it is hard to figure this shit out or find the evidence. It has been obfuscated purposefully to prevent us from doing so. I suggest the "Gold Backed System" is in fact Controlled Opposition. It could be a worthwhile transition, but it is not sufficient, and will inevitably lead directly back to the same problem we have today, or perhaps the same problem we had in the 19th century (which was almost identical to the problem we had today) when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their ilk owned the whole world (they still own it today, but that was when those two families made their biggest moves to the top of the Cabal totem pole).

I suggest you read my report linked previously. It will be very enlightening to you I think.