What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use some commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. Whether it has intrinsic value or not has nothing to do with "fiat". See my post that elaborates this above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary, otherwise people will just use whatever the fuck they want (free market). This is always done (as far as I have found) by taxation. You must pay taxes (specifically income or property taxes) to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay these taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation on what is already yours is thievery. A thus taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to enslave trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use some commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. Whether it has intrinsic value or not has nothing to do with "fiat". See my post that elaborates this above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary, otherwise people will just use whatever the fuck they want (free market). This is always (as far as I have found) done by taxation. You must pay taxes (specifically income or property taxes) to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay these taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation on what is already yours is thievery. A thus taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to enslave trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use some commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. Whether it has intrinsic value or not has nothing to do with "fiat". See my post that elaborates this above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary. This is always (as far as I have found) done by taxation. You must pay taxes (specifically income or property taxes) to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay these taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation on what is already yours is thievery. A thus taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to enslave trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use a single commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. See my post above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary. This is always (as far as I have found) done by taxation. You must pay taxes (specifically income or property taxes) to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay these taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation on what is already yours is thievery. A thus taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to enslave trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use a single commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. See my post above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary. This is always (as far as I have found) done by taxation. You must pay taxes (specifically income or property taxes) to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay these taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation on what is yours is thievery. A thus taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to enslave trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use a single commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. See my post above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary. This is always (as far as I have found) done by taxation. You must pay taxes (specifically income or property taxes) to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay these taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation on what is yours is thievery. A thus taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to enslave trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, and how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use a single commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. See my post above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary. This is always (as far as I have found) done by taxation. You must pay taxes (specifically income or property taxes) to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay these taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation on what is yours is thievery. A thus taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to create a Centralized Authority to control trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, and how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use a single commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. See my post above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

There must also be legal incentives to use a fiat currency, to enforce the fiat (command from Authority) that demanded it's use as intermediary. This is always (as far as I have found) done by taxation. You must pay taxes to the King in the fiat currency, and everyone has to pay taxes, thus everyone uses the fiat currency. But taxation is thievery. A taxed people are an enslaved people. A fiat currency is used exclusively to enslave people and to create a Centralized Authority to control trade.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, and how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.

What I'm saying is that barter doesnt give us a free market any more or less than fiat or single commodity does

A "fiat or single commodity" are the same thing. If all trade must use a single commodity as intermediary, that is what "fiat" means. See my post above.

No one is stopping people from using an intermediary in a Free Market. You can use any intermediary you want. You can trade WHATEVER you want, at any time, in any trade deal.

A Free Market does not exist with restrictions. That is the definition of a free market. A demanded currency is a HUGE restriction to trade, and thus to a free market. Who enforces that trades pass through a fiat currency? Who makes the fiat (demand from an Authority) in the first place? Who regulates that fiat currency? A fiat currency can only exist with a regulatory body. There is no free market if trade is controlled by a regulatory body.

Barter is a weaker option because it can target specific people or groups to destroy,

How? I'm wracking my brain and I can't even contrive a situation where this becomes a true statement, much less be some ubiquitous vulnerability.

where a single commodity or fiat model has the manipulations spread across the entire market place.

Any centralized authority (which is what a fiat currency is) is always the first thing that is created before the takeover of anything. Indeed, my investigation suggests that gold and silver as currency itself was exactly such a centralization of authority. Centralized Authority is Cabal Plan 101. First you convince the public that they need a Centralized Authority, then you create it, then you put your agents in it, then you control the control structure itself. You can't control a decentralized entity. It's too robust. That is the entire purpose behind every Centralized Authority in existence, and every single one was either created by, or subverted by, the Cabal.

A free market is the ultimate decentralization of authority. It is FREE to do whatever both the market, and the individuals making a trade want to do. That includes what trades are going to happen, and how they are going to take place, if some intermediary is going to be used in some trade deal, and what that intermediary is.. The defining characteristic of a Free Market is that it, and the people, are FREE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN PATH. If a free market and a free people are not free to choose their own path, then they are not free at all.

It isn't that barter "gives us a free market." That's putting the cart before the horse. It's that a Free Market only exists with barter.