My apologies, I am referring to the attacks, maybe I shouldnt say attacks but can't really find another term, we have seen even on here and specially with Twitter 'Q" influencers. 100% we need to verify and question everything. But if Q influencers AND the msm is trying to discredit them, but they are with DT for a screening next week, and Ballard was with Trump last night, are we not missing something? Hollywood just went on strike is that coincidence? How many times did Q tell us 'you have more than you know'? If we truly believe in Q, but now in a way, and kind of indirectly no doubt, we don't believe in 45? Does that make sense?
For the record, I never have really listened to TimCast. And know very little about him, besides his Twitter posts and the fact that many people in the Q community have tried to discredit him along with the media right? My point is can we collect our logic we all have acquired in these crazy 6 years and perhaps be the ones who discredit or credit some of these "influencers"? How? I have no idea, maybe someone does. If Ballard does this on TimCast, and Ballard is with Trump, does this not automatically credit TimCast? I am thinking out loud here
Because people will need someone and/or more than 1 on a MIC and on video, because they will not sit there and read Q drops. They are not wired like we are. Specially when shit really hits the fan. I take 'we are the plan' to heart and truly believe so, and again I am just thinking out loud here while i am typing
My apologies, I am referring to the attacks, maybe I shouldnt say attacks but can't really find another term, we have seen even on here and specially with Twitter 'Q" influencers. 100% we need to verify and question everything. But if Q influencers AND the msm is trying to discredit them, but they are with DT for a screening next week, and Ballard was with Trump last night, are we not missing something? Hollywood just went on strike is that coincidence? How many times did Q tell us 'you have more than you know'? If we truly believe in Q, but now in a way, and kind of indirectly no doubt, we don't believe in 45? Does that make sense?
For the record, I never have really listened to TimCast. And know very little about him, besides his Twitter posts and the fact that many people in the Q community have tried to discredit him along with the media right? My point is can we collect our logic we all have acquired in these crazy 6 years and perhaps be the ones who discredit or credit some of these "influencers"? How? I have no idea, maybe someone does. If Ballard does this on TimCast, and Ballard is with Trump, does this not automatically credit TimCast? I am thinking out loud here
Because people will need someone on a MIC and on video, because they will not sit there and read Q drops. They are not wired like we are. Specially when shit really hits the fan. I take we are the plan to heart and truly believe so, and again I am just thinking out loud here while i am typing
My apologies, I am referring to the attacks, maybe I shouldnt say attacks but can't really find another term, we have seen even on here and specially with Twitter 'Q" influencers. 100% we need to verify and question everything. But if Q influencers AND the msm is trying to discredit them, but they are with DT for a screening next week, and Ballard was with Trump last night, are we not missing something? Hollywood just went on strike is that coincidence? How many times did Q tell us 'you have more than you know'? If we truly believe in Q, but now in a way, and kind of indirectly no doubt, we don't believe in 45? Does that make sense?
For the record, I never have really listened to TimCast. And know very little about him, besides his Twitter posts and the fact that many people in the Q community have tried to discredit him along with the media right? My point is can we collect our logic we all have acquired in these crazy 6 years and perhaps be the ones who discredit or credit some of these "influencers"? How? I have no idea, maybe someone does. If Ballard does this on TimCast, and Ballard is with Trump, does this not automatically credit TimCast? I am thinking out loud here
My apologies, I am referring to the attacks, maybe I shouldnt say attacks but can't really find another term, we have seen even on here and specially with Twitter 'Q" influencers. 100% we need to verify and question everything. But if Q influencers AND the msm is trying to discredit them, but they are with DT for a screening next week, and Ballard was with Trump last night, are we not missing something? Hollywood just went on strike is that coincidence? How many times did Q tell us 'you have more than you know'? If we truly believe in Q, but now in a way, and kind of indirectly no doubt, we don't believe in 45? Does that make sense?