One might say he is the tippy top. King of King Lord of Lords

One might say that, but that would be ones belief. If one does not believe that, then different beliefs are ones path.

We don't need to be "organized." Organization is the opposite of personal revelation.

Personally, I think Jesus was trying to tell us something very similar to what the Buddha was trying to tell us:

"I am the Son of God."

"You are All Children of God."

-- Jesus

He wasn't saying he was the "Lord or Lords" or even "Lord" of anything.

"Thou art God."

-- Buddha

It seems to me they are both trying to tell us we are ALL Split-Aparts from Source. Same words, same message, but many who call themselves "Christian" interpret that very differently. My interpretation focuses on all of the words attributed to Jesus in all of the Gospels, not just the ones in the book we got as "truth."

My interpretation, and spiritual path, ignores the "teachings" of Saul, a known agent of the Pharisees (and very likely controlled opposition agent). It ignores the teachings of the Torah and the rest of the OT; all books written by the Priest Class of Jews (the same people that rule the world today). Once you dig in, you find the OT has been so badly mistranslated into English that it completely misses the fact that it talks about numerous gods, and explicitly states (in context with other religions of the region) that El was the creator, and Yahweh the usurper.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." "My name is Jealous." These are just some of the explicit statements of Yahweh that insist that we ignore HIS father, El (not to mention his brother Ba'al).

When you actually read the OT, it becomes immediately obvious that Yahweh was a racist, slaver, and misogynist, who demanded blood sacrifices and first born children as both slaves and for their blood, not to mention a murderer of innocent children (has anyone who calls themselves "Christian" actually read the Passover story?).

The idea of "Lord of Lords" comes from a book that was decided upon three full centuries after Jesus' death, leaving out more books that were doctrine at the time than it included, by people who set up "Christianity" as the de facto religion of the Roman Empire to unite the entire Empire under one religious doctrine, setting up the Emperor as a God-King (religious and political leader). The ideas of "Lord of Lord," and "Trinity," etc. were enforced at that time and written into law (Codex Theodosianus) to ensure that people either believed that "truth" or were punished as heretics. The standard Christian dogma literally comes from Roman Law, written three to four centuries after Jesus. How many Christians actually realize this?

Why don't they?

Your beliefs are not my beliefs. That doesn't make me right and/or you wrong, but please don't try to "organize" my beliefs to align with yours.

That would be a sin.

One might say he is the tippy top. King of King Lord of Lords

One might say that, but that would be ones belief. If one does not believe that, then different beliefs are ones path.

We don't need to be "organized." Organization is the opposite of personal revelation.

Personally, I think Jesus was trying to tell us something very similar to what the Buddha was trying to tell us:

"I am the Son of God."

"You are All Children of God."

-- Jesus

He wasn't saying he was the "Lord or Lords" or even "Lord" of anything.

Thou art God.

-- Buddha

It seems to me they are both trying to tell us we are ALL Split-Aparts from Source. Same words, same message, but many who call themselves "Christian" interpret that very differently. My interpretation focuses on all of the words attributed to Jesus in all of the Gospels, not just the ones in the book we got as "truth."

My interpretation, and spiritual path, ignores the "teachings" of Saul, a known agent of the Pharisees (and very likely controlled opposition agent). It ignores the teachings of the Torah and the rest of the OT; all books written by the Priest Class of Jews (the same people that rule the world today). Once you dig in, you find the OT has been so badly mistranslated into English that it completely misses the fact that it talks about numerous gods, and explicitly states (in context with other religions of the region) that El was the creator, and Yahweh the usurper.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." "My name is Jealous." These are just some of the explicit statements of Yahweh that insist that we ignore HIS father, El (not to mention his brother Ba'al).

When you actually read the OT, it becomes immediately obvious that Yahweh was a racist, slaver, and misogynist, who demanded blood sacrifices and first born children as both slaves and for their blood, not to mention a murderer of innocent children (has anyone who calls themselves "Christian" actually read the Passover story?).

The idea of "Lord of Lords" comes from a book that was decided upon three full centuries after Jesus' death, leaving out more books that were doctrine at the time than it included, by people who set up "Christianity" as the de facto religion of the Roman Empire to unite the entire Empire under one religious doctrine, setting up the Emperor as a God-King (religious and political leader). The ideas of "Lord of Lord," and "Trinity," etc. were enforced at that time and written into law (Codex Theodosianus) to ensure that people either believed that "truth" or were punished as heretics. The standard Christian dogma literally comes from Roman Law, written three to four centuries after Jesus. How many Christians actually realize this?

Why don't they?

Your beliefs are not my beliefs. That doesn't make me right and/or you wrong, but please don't try to "organize" my beliefs to align with yours.

That would be a sin.

One might say he is the tippy top. King of King Lord of Lords

One might say that, but that would be ones belief. If one does not believe that, then different beliefs are ones path.

We don't need to be "organized." Organization is the opposite of personal revelation.

Personally, I think Jesus was trying to tell us something very similar to what the Buddha was trying to tell us:

"I am the Son of God."

"You are All Children of God."

-- Jesus

He wasn't saying he was the "Lord or Lords" or even "Lord" of anything.

Thou art God.

-- Buddha

It seems to me they are both trying to tell us we are ALL Split-Aparts from Source. Same words, same message, but many who call themselves "Christian" interpret that very differently. My interpretation focuses on all of the words attributed to Jesus in all of the Gospels, not just the ones in the book we got as "truth."

My interpretation, and spiritual path, ignores the "teachings" of Saul, a known agent of the Pharisees (and very likely controlled opposition agent). It ignores the teachings of the Torah and the rest of the OT; all books written by the Priest Class of Jews (the same people that rule the world today). Once you dig in, you find the OT has been so badly mistranslated into English that it completely misses the fact that it talks about numerous gods, and explicitly states (in context with other religions of the region) that El was the creator, and Yahweh the usurper.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." "My name is Jealous." These are just some of the explicit statements of Yahweh that insist that we ignore HIS father, El (not to mention his brother Ba'al).

When you actually read the OT, it becomes immediately obvious that Yahweh was a racist, slaver, and misogynist, who demanded blood sacrifices and first born children as both slaves and for their blood, not to mention a murderer of innocent children (has anyone who calls themselves "Christian" actually read the Passover story?).

The idea of "Lord of Lords" comes from a book that was decided upon three full centuries after Jesus' death by people who set up "Christianity" as the de facto religion of the Roman Empire to unite the entire Empire under one religious doctrine, setting up the Emperor as a God-King (religious and political leader). The ideas of "Lord of Lord," and "Trinity," etc. were enforced at that time and written into law (Codex Theodosianus) to ensure that people either believed that "truth" or were punished as heretics. The standard Christian dogma literally comes from Roman Law, written three to four centuries after Jesus. How many Christians actually realize this?

Why don't they?

Your beliefs are not my beliefs. That doesn't make me right and/or you wrong, but please don't try to "organize" my beliefs to align with yours.

That would be a sin.

One might say he is the tippy top. King of King Lord of Lords

One might say that, but that would be ones belief. If one does not believe that, then different beliefs are ones path.

We don't need to be "organized." Organization is the opposite of personal revelation.

Personally, I think Jesus was trying to tell us something very similar to what the Buddha was trying to tell us:

"I am the Son of God."

"You are All Children of God."

-- Jesus

He wasn't setting himself up as "Lord or Lords" or even "Lord" of anything.

Thou art God.

-- Buddha

It seems to me they are both trying to tell us we are ALL Split-Aparts from Source. Same words, same message, but many who call themselves "Christian" interpret that very differently. My interpretation focuses on all of the words attributed to Jesus in all of the Gospels, not just the ones in the book we got as "truth."

My interpretation, and spiritual path, ignores the "teachings" of Saul, a known agent of the Pharisees (and very likely controlled opposition agent). It ignores the teachings of the Torah and the rest of the OT; all books written by the Priest Class of Jews (the same people that rule the world today). Once you dig in, you find the OT has been so badly mistranslated into English that it completely misses the fact that it talks about numerous gods, and explicitly states (in context with other religions of the region) that El was the creator, and Yahweh the usurper.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." "My name is Jealous." These are just some of the explicit statements of Yahweh that insist that we ignore HIS father, El (not to mention his brother Ba'al).

When you actually read the OT, it becomes immediately obvious that Yahweh was a racist, slaver, and misogynist, who demanded blood sacrifices and first born children as both slaves and for their blood, not to mention a murderer of innocent children (has anyone who calls themselves "Christian" actually read the Passover story?).

The idea of "Lord of Lords" comes from a book that was decided upon three full centuries after Jesus' death by people who set up "Christianity" as the de facto religion of the Roman Empire to unite the entire Empire under one religious doctrine, setting up the Emperor as a God-King (religious and political leader). The ideas of "Lord of Lord," and "Trinity," etc. were enforced at that time and written into law (Codex Theodosianus) to ensure that people either believed that "truth" or were punished as heretics. The standard Christian dogma literally comes from Roman Law, written three to four centuries after Jesus. How many Christians actually realize this?

Why don't they?

Your beliefs are not my beliefs. That doesn't make me right and/or you wrong, but please don't try to "organize" my beliefs to align with yours.

That would be a sin.

One might say he is the tippy top. King of King Lord of Lords

One might say that, but that would be ones belief. If one does not believe that, then different beliefs are ones path.

We don't need to be "organized." Organization is the opposite of personal revelation.

Personally, I think Jesus was trying to tell us something very similar to what the Buddha was trying to tell us:

"I am the Son of God."

"You are All Children of God."

-- Jesus

He wasn't setting himself up as "Lord or Lords" or even "Lord" of anything.

Thou art God.

-- Buddha

It seems to me they are both trying to tell us we are ALL Split-Aparts from Source. Same words, same message, but many who call themselves "Christian" interpret that very differently. My interpretation focuses on all of the words attributed to Jesus in all of the Gospels, not just the ones in the book we got as "truth."

My interpretation, and spiritual path, ignores the "teachings" of Saul, a known agent of the Pharisees (and very likely controlled opposition agent). It ignores the teachings of the Torah and the rest of the OT; all books written by the Priest Class of Jews (the same people that rule the world today). Once you dig in, you find the OT has been so badly mistranslated into English that it completely misses the fact that it talks about numerous gods, and explicitly states (in context with other religions of the region) that El was the creator, and Yahweh the usurper.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." "My name is Jealous." These are just some of the explicit statements of Yahweh that insist that we ignore HIS father, El (not to mention his brother Ba'al).

When you actually read the OT, it becomes immediately obvious that Yahweh was a racist, slaver, and misogynist, who demanded blood sacrifices and first born children as both slaves and for their blood, not to mention a murderer of innocent children (has anyone who calls themselves "Christian" actually read the Passover story?).

The idea of "Lord of Lords" comes from a book that was decided upon three full centuries after Jesus' death by people who set up "Christianity" as the de facto religion of the Roman Empire to unite the entire Empire under one religious doctrine, setting up the Emperor as a God-King (religious and political leader). The ideas of "Lord of Lord," and "Trinity," etc. were enforced at that time and written into law (Codex Theodosianus) to ensure that people either believed that "truth" or were punished as heretics.

Your beliefs are not my beliefs. That doesn't make me right and/or you wrong, but please don't try to "organize" my beliefs to align with yours.

That would be a sin.

One might say he is the tippy top. King of King Lord of Lords

One might say that, but that would be ones belief. If one does not believe that, then different beliefs are ones path.

We don't need to be "organized." Organization is the opposite of personal revelation.

Personally, I think Jesus was trying to tell us something very similar to what the Buddha was trying to tell us:

"I am the Son of God."

"You are All Children of God."

-- Jesus

He wasn't setting himself up as "Lord or Lords" or even "Lord" of anything. He was trying to tell us we are ALL Split-Aparts from Source.

Thou art God.

-- Buddha

Same words, same message, but many who call themselves "Christian" interpret that very differently. My interpretation focuses on all of the words attributed to Jesus in all of the Gospels, not just the ones in the book we got as "truth."

My interpretation, and spiritual path, ignores the "teachings" of Saul, a known agent of the Pharisees (and very likely controlled opposition agent). It ignores the teachings of the Torah and the rest of the OT; all books written by the Priest Class of Jews (the same people that rule the world today). Once you dig in, you find the OT has been so badly mistranslated into English that it completely misses the fact that it talks about numerous gods, and explicitly states (in context with other religions of the region) that El was the creator, and Yahweh the usurper.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." "My name is Jealous." These are just some of the explicit statements of Yahweh that insist that we ignore HIS father, El (not to mention his brother Ba'al).

When you actually read the OT, it becomes immediately obvious that Yahweh was a racist, slaver, and misogynist, who demanded blood sacrifices and first born children as both slaves and for their blood, not to mention a murderer of innocent children (has anyone who calls themselves "Christian" actually read the Passover story?).

The idea of "Lord of Lords" comes from a book that was decided upon three full centuries after Jesus' death by people who set up "Christianity" as the de facto religion of the Roman Empire to unite the entire Empire under one religious doctrine, setting up the Emperor as a God-King (religious and political leader). The ideas of "Lord of Lord," and "Trinity," etc. were enforced at that time and written into law (Codex Theodosianus) to ensure that people either believed that "truth" or were punished as heretics.

Your beliefs are not my beliefs. That doesn't make me right and/or you wrong, but please don't try to "organize" my beliefs to align with yours.

That would be a sin.