It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.

Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.

I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, a few months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.

If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements that smack of "this is the truth." This suggests "I know you are wrong" to anyone who has a different assessment, which immediately puts a persons back up. Rather say, "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this." The very best way to make statements is to not make them at all, rather show things with evidence.

You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.

It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.

Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.

I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, many months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.

If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements that smack of "this is the truth." This suggests "I know you are wrong" to anyone who has a different assessment, which immediately puts a persons back up. Rather say, "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this." The very best way to make statements is to not make them at all, rather show things with evidence.

You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.

It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.

Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.

I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, many months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.

If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements of "this is the truth." This suggests "I know something you don't know," which immediately puts a persons back up. Rather say, "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this." The very best way to make statements is to not make them at all, rather show things with evidence.

You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.

It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.

Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.

I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, many months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.

If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements of "this is the truth." This suggests "I know something you don't know," which immediately puts a persons back up. Rather say, "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this."

You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.

It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.

Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.

I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, many months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.

If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements of "this is the truth," rather say, "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this."

You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.

It depends on how you frame it. "It falls to us to save ourselves, and here's why" is a perfectly solid argument to make. I make it all the time. It seems to be well received. You can even use Q or "The Plan" to do it. I think The Plan is to teach us who we are, that we are the Sovereigns of our domain, to teach us what "Sovereignty" means, and what that domain (Jurisdiction) is. I have made that argument many times since there is so much evidence to support it.

Making your argument, whatever that may be, is the most important thing. It doesn't really matter how many see it the first time you make it.

I made an argument on Critical Thinking once. It got almost no views (30 likes maybe). Then, many months later, I linked to it in another post as part of a different argument and then it got pinned. You never know when something will gain traction, or how ideas will seep into the social mindscape, but persistence and making the argument in the first place are essential elements of dissemination.

If you have something that you feel should be said, then say it. Just keep your audience in mind. If you feel it is likely to be dismissed, use a Rogerian approach, or otherwise give concessions where warranted. Don't make statements of "this is the truth," rather, say "this is what I've found," or "what do you think of this?" or "maybe it's like this."

You can't keep good ideas to yourself, but with persistence and care, you can make a good case. With feedback, both positive and negative, you can make a better argument the next time you want to put it forth.