Your claim is partially accurate but needs further context and clarification. When books are removed from the biblical canon, it does result in a change to the collection of texts, and these removed books will no longer be included in the Bible. This aspect of your claim is true.

However, whether the removal of certain books would significantly change the overall perspective on the rest of the Bible depends on the specific books in question and their contents. The biblical canon was formed over centuries through careful considerations of various criteria, including apostolic authorship, orthodox content, and widespread acceptance. The books that were eventually included were deemed to be consistent with the core teachings and beliefs of Judaism (if were solely discussing the Old Testament)..

While some removed books, known as apocryphal or pseudepigraphal writings, may offer additional historical or theological insights, their exclusion didn't drastically alter the central message and doctrines of the Bible. The core themes and teachings that are essential to Christianity and Judaism are found in the accepted books of the Bible, and these teachings remain unchanged regardless of the exclusion of other writings.

In summary, your claim correctly acknowledges that removing books from the biblical canon does result in changes to the collection of texts. However, it should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis whether these excluded books would have significantly altered the overall perspective on the rest of the OT Bible, keeping in mind that the canonical books were selected based on established criteria to preserve the essential teachings of the Judaism faith.

This claim is partially accurate but needs further context and clarification. When books are removed from the biblical canon, it does result in a change to the collection of texts, and these removed books will no longer be included in the Bible. This aspect of your claim is true.

However, whether the removal of certain books would significantly change the overall perspective on the rest of the Bible depends on the specific books in question and their contents. The biblical canon was formed over centuries through careful considerations of various criteria, including apostolic authorship, orthodox content, and widespread acceptance. The books that were eventually included were deemed to be consistent with the core teachings and beliefs of Judaism (if were solely discussing the Old Testament)..

While some removed books, known as apocryphal or pseudepigraphal writings, may offer additional historical or theological insights, their exclusion didn't drastically alter the central message and doctrines of the Bible. The core themes and teachings that are essential to Christianity and Judaism are found in the accepted books of the Bible, and these teachings remain unchanged regardless of the exclusion of other writings.

In summary, your claim correctly acknowledges that removing books from the biblical canon does result in changes to the collection of texts. However, it should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis whether these excluded books would have significantly altered the overall perspective on the rest of the OT Bible, keeping in mind that the canonical books were selected based on established criteria to preserve the essential teachings of the Judaism faith.