To The Great Awakening

In that first video, he says, "The moment you address the merits of the case, YOU LOSE." He uses the RULES, and NOT the law.

Notice in my traffic ticket case, I NEVER discussed whether or not I was speeding, or driving, or had a driver's license, or whether or not there was a contract, or ANY of that.

I merely challenged the AUTHORITY OF THE COURT to hear the case ... AT ALL.

I think that is WHY it was dismissed.

The system is so corrupt today that they CANNOT uphold the law. The best they can do is give the APPEARANCE of upholding the law, while maintaining the corruption INSTEAD of upholding the actual law.

Today, it is ALL ABOUT raking in the money and having CONTROL over the people.

It is NOT about protecting the rights of the individual, which is how the government is actually structured -- and what their oaths of office REQUIRE them to do.

This means that the DE FACTO actual operation of the system is in direct conflict with the REAL system structure that is already in place.

They are trying to jam a round peg into a square hole because they make money and gain control if they can do it.

But it fundamenally CANNOT be done.

THAT is why there is an inherent flaw in the system -- a flaw that can be utilized to win.

MOST attorneys are completely oblivious to this conflict because they are taught to ignore this conflict as a condition of graduating law school.

1 year ago

1 score

Reason: None provided.

^ Follow up ...

I found what I mentioned before.

Here are 3 short videos talking about how the best strategy is to force the court's own rules on the court, and NOT to even deal with the facts or the law.

The person recording these videos posted vids on his YT channel 10 or so years ago. He claimed to have had several victories and helping others, mostly with traffic ticket cases.

But he plays a recording of someone else who claimed to have victories in much more serious cases. And he said he used the rules of the court to win cases.

He also has posted other videos on YT, but they are scattered around, and most of it I haven't really checked out.

Anyway, have a listen and think about this approach.

There is no arguing the law or contracts or any of that. I don't know how accurate what he says is, but the gist of it rings true to me.

"Most people are in jail voluntarily"

In that first video, he says, "The moment you address the merits of the case, YOU LOSE." He uses the RULES, and NOT the law.

Notice in my traffic ticket case, I NEVER discussed whether or not I was speeding, or driving, or had a driver's license, or whether or not there was a contract, or ANY of that.

I merely challenged the AUTHORITY OF THE COURT to hear the case ... AT ALL.

I think that is WHY it was dismissed.

The system is so corrupt today that they CANNOT uphold the law. The best they can do is give the APPEARANCE of upholding the law, while maintaining the corruption INSTEAD of upholding the actual law.

Today, it is ALL ABOUT raking in the money and having CONTROL over the people.

It is NOT about protecting the rights of the individual, which is how the government is actually structured -- and what their oaths of office REQUIRE them to do.

This means that the DE FACTO actual operation of the system is in direct conflict with the REAL system structure that is already in place.

They are trying to jam a round peg into a square hole because they make money and gain control if they can do it.

But it fundamenally CANNOT be done.

THAT is why there is an inherent flaw in the system -- a flaw that can be utilized to win.

1 year ago

1 score

Reason: None provided.

^ Follow up ...

I found what I mentioned before.

Here are 3 short videos talking about how the best strategy is to force the court's own rules on the court, and NOT to even deal with the facts or the law.

The person recording these videos posted vids on his YT channel 10 or so years ago. He claimed to have had several victories and helping others, mostly with traffic ticket cases.

But he plays a recording of someone else who claimed to have victories in much more serious cases. And he said he used the rules of the court to win cases.

He also has posted other videos on YT, but they are scattered around, and most of it I haven't really checked out.

Anyway, have a listen and think about this approach.

There is no arguing the law or contracts or any of that. I don't know how accurate what he says is, but the gist of it rings true to me.

"Most people are in jail voluntarily"

In that first video, he says, "The moment you address the merits of the case, YOU LOSE." He uses the RULES, and NOT the law.

Notice in my traffic ticket case, I NEVER discussed whether or not I was speeding, or driving, or had a driver's license, or whether or not there was a contract, or ANY of that.

I merely challenged the AUTHORITY OF THE COURT to hear the case ... AT ALL.

I think that is WHY it was dismissed.

The system is so corrupt today that they CANNOT uphold the law. The best they can do is give the APPEARANCE of upholding the law, while maintaining the corruption INSTEAD of upholding the actual law.

Today, it is ALL ABOUT raking in the money and having CONTROL over the people.

It is NOT about protecting the rights of the individual, which is how the government is actually structured.

This means that the DE FACTO actual operation of the system is in direct conflict with the REAL system structure that is already in place.

They are trying to jam a round peg into a square hole because they make money and gain control if they can do it.

But it fundamenally CANNOT be done.

THAT is why there is an inherent flaw in the system -- a flaw that can be utilized to win.

1 year ago

1 score

Reason: None provided.

^ Follow up ...

I found what I mentioned before.

Here are 3 short videos talking about how the best strategy is to force the court's own rules on the court, and NOT to even deal with the facts or the law.

The person recording these videos posted vids on his YT channel 10 or so years ago. He claimed to have had several victories and helping others, mostly with traffic ticket cases.

But he plays a recording of someone else who claimed to have victories in much more serious cases. And he said he used the rules of the court to win cases.

He also has posted other videos on YT, but they are scattered around, and most of it I haven't really checked out.

Anyway, have a listen and think about this approach.

There is no arguing the law or contracts or any of that. I don't know how accurate what he says is, but the gist of it rings true to me.

"Most people are in jail voluntarily"

In that first video, he says, "The moment you address the merits of the case, YOU LOSE." He uses the RULES, and NOT the law.

Notice in my traffic ticket case, I NEVER discussed whether or not I was speeding, or driving, or had a driver's license, or whether or not there was a contract, or ANY of that.

I merely challenged the AUTHORITY OF THE COURT to hear the case ... AT ALL.

I think that is WHY it was dismissed.

The system is so corrupt today that they CANNOT uphold the law. The best they can do is give the APPEARANCE of upholding the law, while maintaing the corrupting INSTEAD of upholding the actual law.

1 year ago

1 score

Reason: None provided.

^ Follow up ...

I found what I mentioned before.

Here are 3 short videos talking about how the best strategy is to force the court's own rules on the court, and NOT to even deal with the facts or the law.

The person recording these videos posted vids on his YT channel 10 or so years ago. He claimed to have had several victories and helping others, mostly with traffic ticket cases.

But he plays a recording of someone else who claimed to have victories in much more serious cases. And he said he used the rules of the court to win cases.

He also has posted other videos on YT, but they are scattered around, and most of it I haven't really checked out.

Anyway, have a listen and think about this approach.

There is no arguing the law or contracts or any of that. I don't know how accurate what he says is, but the gist of it rings true to me.

"Most people are in jail voluntarily"

In that first video, he says, "The moment you address the merits of the case, YOU LOSE." He uses the RULES, and NOT the law.

Notice in my traffic ticket case, I NEVER discussed whether or not I was speeding, or driving, or had a driver's license, or whether or not there was a contract, or ANY of that.

I merely challenged the court's AUTHORITY to hear the case ... AT ALL.

I think that is WHY it was dismissed.

1 year ago

1 score

Reason: Original

^ Follow up ...

I found what I mentioned before.

Here are 3 short videos talking about how the best strategy is to force the court's own rules on the court, and NOT to even deal with the facts or the law.

The person recording these videos posted vids on his YT channel 10 or so years ago. He claimed to have had several victories and helping others, mostly with traffic ticket cases.

But he plays a recording of someone else who claimed to have victories in much more serious cases. And he said he used the rules of the court to win cases.

He also has posted other videos on YT, but they are scattered around, and most of it I haven't really checked out.

Anyway, have a listen and think about this approach.

There is no arguing the law or contracts or any of that. I don't know how accurate what he says is, but the gist of it rings true to me.

"Most people are in jail voluntarily"