I just thought about if there are no more d's, then there is no past tense.

Surely I'm wrong.

And and there's no edits without d's! AND there's no ands!

So, yeah, of course I'm wrong. Past tense still exists with came and went (no d's). Subs for edits are changes plus markups. Also plus plus can replace and.

But but what about DECLASS?

Of course I am wrong. Must keep the d's.

I just thought about if there are no more d's, then there is no past tense.

Surely I'm wrong.

And and there's no edits without d's! AND there's no ands!

So, yeah, of course I'm wrong. Past tense still exists with came and went (no d's). Subs for edits are changes plus markups. Also can replace and.

But but what about DECLASS?

Of course I am wrong. Must keep the d's.

I just thought about if there are no more d's, then there is no past tense.

Surely I'm wrong.