I read through it (almost all of it, though it can be sleep inducing at points), but I didn't find anything that led to any implication of bankruptcy of the US. Nor do I see how this tied into the Organic Act of 1871. Not to say they aren't related, I just didn't see anything on a reading of it.
This Treaty is regarding the Alabama Claims, which is itself a very interesting tidbit about the civil war not taught in school:
The United States demanded compensation from Britain for the damage wrought by the British-built, Southern-operated commerce raiders, based upon the argument that the British Government, by aiding the creation of a Confederate Navy, had inadequately followed its neutrality laws. The damages discussed were enormous. Charles Sumner, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, argued that British aid to the Confederacy had prolonged the Civil War by 2 years, and indirectly cost the United States hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars (the figure Sumner suggested was $2.125 billion).
This led to the Treaty of Washington which laid the groundwork for our system of International Law (which is to say, a One World Government) and is tied to the creation of the League of Nations (later called the United Nations).
The link above says this about the resolution:
At Geneva, in 1872, the United States was awarded $15,500,000 pursuant to the terms of the treaty, and the British apologized for the destruction caused by the British-built Confederate ships but admitted no guilt. However, no compensation for damages done to the U.S. by British-built blockade runners carrying arms supplies to the Confederacy (which prolonged the war by two years and killed 400,000 additional Americans) was offered.
The ties to the League of Nations/UN are particularly interesting. If it walks like Bankster fuckery, and talks like Bankster fuckery, it's probably fuckery of the Bankster variety.
Still, the details of how this document relates to the supposed bankruptcy of the USA or the creation of the D.C. city-state eludes me.
I read through it (almost all of it, though it can be sleep inducing at points), but I didn't find anything that led to any implication of bankruptcy of the US. Nor do I see how this tied into the Organic Act of 1871. Not to say they aren't related, I just didn't see anything on a reading of it.
This Treaty is regarding the Alabama Claims, which is itself a very interesting tidbit about the civil war not taught in school:
The United States demanded compensation from Britain for the damage wrought by the British-built, Southern-operated commerce raiders, based upon the argument that the British Government, by aiding the creation of a Confederate Navy, had inadequately followed its neutrality laws. The damages discussed were enormous. Charles Sumner, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, argued that British aid to the Confederacy had prolonged the Civil War by 2 years, and indirectly cost the United States hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars (the figure Sumner suggested was $2.125 billion).
This lead to the Treaty of Washington which laid the groundwork for our system of International Law (which is to say, a One World Government) and is tied to the creation of the League of Nations (later called the United Nations).
The link above says this about the resolution:
At Geneva, in 1872, the United States was awarded $15,500,000 pursuant to the terms of the treaty, and the British apologized for the destruction caused by the British-built Confederate ships but admitted no guilt. However, no compensation for damages done to the U.S. by British-built blockade runners carrying arms supplies to the Confederacy (which prolonged the war by two years and killed 400,000 additional Americans) was offered.
The ties to the League of Nations/UN are particularly interesting. If it walks like Bankster fuckery, and talks like Bankster fuckery, it's probably fuckery of the Bankster variety.
Still, the details of how this document relates to the supposed bankruptcy of the USA or the creation of the D.C. city-state eludes me.
I read through it (almost all of it, though it can be sleep inducing at points), but I didn't find anything that led to any implication of bankruptcy of the US. Nor do I see how this tied into the Organic Act of 1871. Not to say they aren't related, I just didn't see anything on a reading of it.
This Treaty is regarding the Alabama Claims, which is itself a very interesting tidbit not taught in school:
The United States demanded compensation from Britain for the damage wrought by the British-built, Southern-operated commerce raiders, based upon the argument that the British Government, by aiding the creation of a Confederate Navy, had inadequately followed its neutrality laws. The damages discussed were enormous. Charles Sumner, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, argued that British aid to the Confederacy had prolonged the Civil War by 2 years, and indirectly cost the United States hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars (the figure Sumner suggested was $2.125 billion).
This lead to the Treaty of Washington which laid the groundwork for our system of International Law (which is to say, a One World Government) and is tied to the creation of the League of Nations (later called the United Nations).
The link above says this about the resolution:
At Geneva, in 1872, the United States was awarded $15,500,000 pursuant to the terms of the treaty, and the British apologized for the destruction caused by the British-built Confederate ships but admitted no guilt. However, no compensation for damages done to the U.S. by British-built blockade runners carrying arms supplies to the Confederacy (which prolonged the war by two years and killed 400,000 additional Americans) was offered.
The ties to the League of Nations/UN are particularly interesting. If it walks like Bankster fuckery, and talks like Bankster fuckery, it's probably fuckery of the Bankster variety.
Still, the details of how this document relates to the supposed bankruptcy of the USA or the creation of the D.C. city-state eludes me.