So the court Document was about Twitter complying with the search warrant, they did but they did so late and incomplete and were found to be in contempt of court. They were fined $350,000. This document is the Appeals Court affirming the original court. Twitter was trying to say they had objections to the "disclosure" issue with the original warrant and they shouldn't have been in contempt until that was resolved.

The most interesting thing I see so far is this PUBLIC COPY - SEALED INFORMATION DELETED

so some information is still sealed AND, they didn't just redact it, they created a copy without it.

EDIT: there is some redacted info in there and I think every case is when they cite another document.

So the court Document was about Twitter complying with the search warrant, they did but they did so late and incomplete and were found to be in contempt of court. They were fined $350,000. This document is the Appeals Court affirming the original court. Twitter was trying to say they had objections to the "disclosure" issue with the original warrant and they shouldn't have been in contempt until that was resolved.

The most interesting thing I see so far is this PUBLIC COPY - SEALED INFORMATION DELETED

so some information is still sealed AND, they didn't just redact it, they created a copy without it.