You temporarily banned someone for a week - not for violating side bar rules, but because they don’t believe a specific ANON theory, and explicitly said they only follow Q posts… Let’s call it for what it is, instead of passive aggressive adhominims about my post history or dressing up a temporary ban and calling it a vacation and assigning homework. You should be concerned that you’re banning anons for other things besides the actual rules, no matter what other people think. It just seems like a power run, banning anyone (whether temporary or permanently) for not agreeing with you - not Q, not Trump, but your own theories.

No one. Emphasis on NOONE, except the Q team, knows the plan. If devolution ends up not being a part of the plan, how will you rectify falsely punishing other anons for not believing a then-disproven theory? Will you “vacation” yourself?

You temporarily banned someone for a week - not for violating side bar rules, but because they don’t believe a specific ANON theory, and explicitly said they only follow Q posts… Let’s call it for what it is, instead of passive aggressive adhominims about my post history or dressing up a temporary ban and calling it a vacation and assigning homework. You should be concerned that you’re banning anons for other things besides the actual rules, no matter what other people think. It just seems like a power run, banning anyone (whether temporary or permanently) for not agreeing with you - not Q, not Trump, but your own theories.