are you a censor ?

Thanks for the reply.

I'm not a censor; I'm a member of this community. Don't you think that each of us has a responsibility to vet the information that we communally share? And to point out salient aspects of the information war we are involved in? That's our minimal collective responsibility, imo.

I would like to redirect your attention to my comment. Another read should make it clear that I did NOT refer to your post as "clickbait post" (which would imply that YOU are posting for clickbait reasons). I'm not saying that you are made a clickbait post, or that you intentionally posted clickbait.

I'm pointing out that this article is from a known disinfo, clickbait website operation, which is a fact. I assumed you were not aware of this, which is why I commented.

If you put aside any feeling that your personal dignity or motivation has been impugned upon (it hasn't) and apply a less reactive review, you'll notice this very point:

The approach is to always take a grain of truth and attach sensationalist bull-dust headlines to it that ......

What you've shared here confirms this point. There's no real dispute that Harari is scum or that he doesn't have certain views re: 'conspiracy theorists', particularly those dealing with the Cabal, BUT the headline "Top WEF Official: ‘Dangerous Conspiracy Theorists Must Be Eliminated’?

I suppose it would be fair to add that the approach also includes taking a body of truth and using that to launch outrageous and sensationalist narratives.

Careful reading of the article will lead you to discover the sources.

Where does Harari say that CTs must be dragged off, shot in the back of the head, and whacked? (Or dragged to death camps) Which is the direct nuance of the headline. It's doesn't.

And that's the whole point.

TPV is a known disinfo operation. If it required no discernment to cut through their crap, it wouldn't be very effective, would it?

TPV, which changed its name from NewsPunch earlier this year, consistently uses this very tactic. And any real critical research into the organization and what it does reveals exactly what it is.

A serious analysis of their approach, their history and their articles confirms it.

A final comment:

As anons, it doesn't serve our community for us to adopt superficial narratives that stroke our emotional triggers and the triggers of newcomers. We should be aware that we are constantly targeted with all sorts of psyops that would seek to undermine our work and our community. TPV is one of those.

Also, it's important for us to NOT be too self-identified with what we post and how we view things, because when we are, we'll always react as if that being challenged in some way is a personal issue, and a personal matter. (I've certainly been there, done that.)

But it isn't personal. We're here about seeking truth, after all. Right?

wwg1wga

are you a censor ?

Thanks for the reply.

I'm not a censor; I'm a member of this community. Don't you think that each of us has a responsibility to vet the information that we communally share? And to point out salient aspects of the information war we are involved in? A collective sense of responsibility is important, imo.

I would like to redirect your attention to my comment. Another read should make it clear that I did NOT refer to you post as "clickbait post", which would imply that YOU are posting for clickbait reasons. I'm not suggesting in any way that you are making a clickbait post, or that you are intentionally posting clickbait.

I'm pointing out that this article is from a known disinfo, clickbait website operation, which is a fact. I assumed you were not aware of this, which is why I commented.

If you take the effort to put aside a reactive response because you feel like your personal dignity or motivation has been impugned upon (it hasn't) and apply a less reactive review, you'll notice this very point:

The approach is to always take a grain of truth and attach sensationalist bull-dust headlines to it that ......

What you've shared here confirms this point. There's no real dispute that Harari is scum or that he doesn't have certain views re: 'conspiracy theorists', particularly those dealing with the Cabal, BUT the headline "Top WEF Official: ‘Dangerous Conspiracy Theorists Must Be Eliminated’?

Careful reading of the article will lead you to discover the sources.

Where does Harari say that CTs must be dragged off, shot in the back of the head, and whacked? (Or dragged to death camps) Which is the direct nuance of the headline. It's doesn't.

And that's the whole point.

It's a known disinfo operation. if it required no discernment to cut through their crap, it wouldn't be very effective, would it?

TPV which changed its name from NewsPunch earlier this year consistently uses this very tactic. And any real critical research into the organization and what it does shows exactly what it is.

A serious analysis of their approach, their history and their articles confirms this.

As anons, it doesn't serve our community for us to adopt superficial narratives that stroke our emotional triggers and the triggers of newcomers. We should always be aware that we are constantly targeted with all sorts of psyops that would seek to undermine our work and our community.

Also, it's important for us to NOT be so identified with what we post and how we view things, because when we are, we'll always react as if that being challenged in some way is a personal issue, and a personal matter.

It isn't. We're here about seeking truth, after all. Right?

wwg1wga