The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut (please see previous link to understand that sentence). No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind. It functions by creating two sides at each step (controlled opposition) which leads the the "Synthesis," a preplanned event that comes from the "conflict" (contrived) by the "two sides" in the dialectic. This dialectic has had total control of all the world for a few centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America ("Roaring Twenties"), and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. To be brief, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other and the Cabal, Lincoln's son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut (please see previous link to understand that sentence). No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind. It functions by creating two sides at each step (controlled opposition) which leads the the "Synthesis," a preplanned event that comes from the "conflict" (contrived) by the "two sides" in the dialectic. This dialectic has had total control of all the world for a few centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. To be brief, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other and the Cabal, Lincoln's son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut (please see previous link to understand that sentence). No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind. It functions by creating two sides at each step (controlled opposition) which leads the the "Synthesis," a preplanned event that comes from the "conflict" (contrived) by the "two sides" in the dialectic. This dialectic has had total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. To be brief, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other and the Cabal, Lincoln's son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut (please see previous link to understand that sentence). No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. To be brief, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other and the Cabal, Lincoln's son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut. No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. To be brief, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other and the Cabal, Lincoln's son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut. No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. On the contrary, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other and the Cabal, Lincoln's son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut. No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. On the contrary, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other, Lincolns son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence (Inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited). This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut. No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. On the contrary, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other, Lincolns son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence (Inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited). This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut. No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. On the contrary, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other, Lincolns son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence (Inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited). This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut. No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. On the contrary, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other, Lincolns son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.

The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.

There are two problems with this statement.

1. The United States of America was a governmental corporation set up by a group of men in 1787 designed to Rule the collective. People who espouse this argument base it on a misapprehension of what a "corporation" means.

From Blacks Law Dictionary:

corporation: An artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state. An association of persons created by statute as a legal entity. The law treats the corporation itself as a person which can sue and be sued.

A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.

This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..

2. The idea that the Organic Act of 1871 was necessary to subvert the original Constitution,

That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).

The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government.

This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).

The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval.

The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).

Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.

Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence (Inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited). This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut. No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.

They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created

Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”

 the social constructs of the transgender movements.

“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind, and with total control of all the world for around two centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America, and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.

That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.

This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. On the contrary, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.

It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. 

Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.

Please read my report to understand how it happened.

The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. 

It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.

deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid.

My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other, Lincolns son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.

The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.

That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.