You reply with more talking points? Where is you refutation? Where is your evidence? I've got plenty!

I told you that I'd openly debate you -- pick your spot. Paul, Old Testament, Church Fathers. You know, something that was written down long ago, not a modern day preacher that wants to tell you 'everything is easy, come to my church, help me pay my rent.'

You sound just like a liberal, spouting 'the other guy is bad' while refusing to read the Biblical and historical evidence. I teach Scripture. I can answer anything you'd like to throw at me.

And again, just like a liberal, saying 'look how fragile you are', 'you should have ignored my devilish words if you were really strong', in other words -- 'I should be allowed to say anything without being challenged'. Not here.

You want to know who 'follows the traditions of men'? Those who followed men away from Jesus Christ's Church.

You want to know who 'follows Satan'? Those who slander and divide.

Where is your evidence? You show me your wishful interpretations, and I'll show you my hard, cold evidence. Or do you not want to play with someone who knows their stuff?

Explain to me how the men who learned directly from the Apostles are unanimous in their description of the Mass, the Eucharist, the Church structure, and more -- but you, 2000 years later, somehow 'know better'. If they were so wrong-headed and 'followers of Satan', explain why you believe in the Bible that they put together.

Of course, you could also just throw back some talking points that make you feel comfortable...

You reply with more talking points? Where is you refutation? Where is your evidence? I've got plenty!

I told you that I'd openly debate you -- pick your spot. Paul, Old Testament, Church Fathers. You know, something that was written down long ago, not a modern day preacher that wants to tell you 'everything is easy, come to my church, help me pay my rent.'

You sound just like a liberal, spouting 'the other guy is bad' while refusing to read the Biblical and historical evidence. I teach Scripture. I can answer anything you'd like to throw at me.

And again, just like a liberal, saying 'look how fragile you are', 'you should have ignored my devilish words if you were really strong', in other words -- 'I should be allowed to say anything without being challenged'. Not here.

You want to know who 'follows the traditions of men'? Those who followed men away from Jesus Christ's Church.

You want to know who 'follows Satan'? Those who slander and divide.

Where is your evidence? You show me your wishful interpretations, and I'll show you my hard, cold evidence. Or do you not want to play with someone who knows their stuff?

Explain to me how the men who learned directly from the Apostles are unanimous in their description of the Mass, the Eucharist, the Church structure,and more -- but you, 2000 years later, somehow 'know better'. If they were so wrong-headed and 'followers of Satan', explain why you believe in the Bible that they put together.

Of course, you could also just throw back some talking points that make you feel comfortable...

You reply with more talking points? Where is you refutation? Where is your evidence? I've got plenty!

I told you that I'd openly debate you -- pick your spot. Paul, Old Testament, Church Fathers. You know, something that was written down long ago, not a modern day preacher that wants to tell you 'everything is easy, come to my church, help me pay my rent.'

You sound just like a liberal, spouting 'the other guy is bad' while refusing to read the Biblical and historical evidence. I teach Scripture. I can answer anything you'd like to throw at me.

And again, just like a liberal, saying 'look how fragile you are', 'you should have ignored my devilish words if you were really strong', in other words -- 'I should be allowed to say anything without being challenged'. Not here.

You want to know who 'follows the traditions of men'? Those who followed men away from Jesus Christ's Church.

You want to know who 'follows Satan'? Ask yourself who slanders and who divides.

Where is your evidence? You show me your wishful interpretations, and I'll show you my hard, cold evidence. Or do you not want to play with someone who knows their stuff?

Explain to me how the men who learned directly from the Apostles are unanimous in their description of the Mass, the Eucharist, the Church structure,and more -- but you, 2000 years later, somehow 'know better'. If they were so wrong-headed and 'followers of Satan', explain why you believe in the Bible that they put together.

Of course, you could also just throw back some talking points that make you feel comfortable...

You reply with more talking points? Where is you refutation? Where is your evidence? I've got plenty!

I told you that I'd openly debate you -- pick your spot. Paul, Old Testament, Church Fathers. You know, something that was written down long ago, not a modern day preacher that wants to tell you 'everything is easy, come to my church, help me pay my rent.'

You sound just like a liberal, spouting 'the other guy is bad' while refusing to read the Biblical and historical evidence. I teach Scripture. I can answer anything you'd like to throw at me.

And again, just like a liberal, saying 'look how fragile you are', 'you should have ignored my devilish words if you were really strong', in other words -- 'I should be allowed to say anything without being challenged'. Not here.

You want to know who follows the 'traditions of men'? Those who followed men away from Jesus Christ's Church.

You want to know who 'follows Satan'? Ask yourself who *slanders and who divides.

Where is your evidence? You show me your wishful interpretations, and I'll show you my hard, cold evidence. Or do you not want to play with someone who knows their stuff?

Explain to me how the men who learned directly from the Apostles are unanimous in their description of the Mass, the Eucharist, the Church structure,and more -- but you, 2000 years later, somehow 'know better'. If they were so wrong-headed and 'followers of Satan', explain why you believe in the Bible that they put together.

Of course, you could also just throw back some talking points that make you feel comfortable...